Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease
- PMID: 25176289
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1465
Abstract
Background: We hypothesized that in patients with stable coronary artery disease and stenosis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed on the basis of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) would be superior to medical therapy.
Methods: In 1220 patients with stable coronary artery disease, we assessed the FFR in all stenoses that were visible on angiography. Patients who had at least one stenosis with an FFR of 0.80 or less were randomly assigned to undergo FFR-guided PCI plus medical therapy or to receive medical therapy alone. Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 received medical therapy alone and were included in a registry. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 2 years.
Results: The rate of the primary end point was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (8.1% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.57; P<0.001). This reduction was driven by a lower rate of urgent revascularization in the PCI group (4.0% vs. 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38; P<0.001), with no significant between-group differences in the rates of death and myocardial infarction. Urgent revascularizations that were triggered by myocardial infarction or ischemic changes on electrocardiography were less frequent in the PCI group (3.4% vs. 7.0%, P=0.01). In a landmark analysis, the rate of death or myocardial infarction from 8 days to 2 years was lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (4.6% vs. 8.0%, P=0.04). Among registry patients, the rate of the primary end point was 9.0% at 2 years.
Conclusions: In patients with stable coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI, as compared with medical therapy alone, improved the outcome. Patients without ischemia had a favorable outcome with medical therapy alone. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; FAME 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01132495.).
Comment in
-
FFR-guided PCI--FAME may not be so fleeting after all.N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1251-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1410336. Epub 2014 Sep 1. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25176288 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI.N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1412894. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 25551539 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI.N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):94-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1412894. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 25551540 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 22924638 Clinical Trial.
-
Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803538. Epub 2018 May 22. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29785878 Clinical Trial.
-
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20537493 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0427-8. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016. PMID: 27912739 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia: a collaborative meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):232-40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12855. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24296791 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of functional coronary stenosis by computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in surgical revascularization.JTCVS Open. 2024 Jul 24;21:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.07.012. eCollection 2024 Oct. JTCVS Open. 2024. PMID: 39534348 Free PMC article.
-
Role of physiology in the management of multivessel disease among patients with acute coronary syndrome.AsiaIntervention. 2024 Sep 27;10(3):157-168. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00051. eCollection 2024 Sep. AsiaIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39347110 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative Analysis of the Feasibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Index Versus CT-FFR in the Diagnosis of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 12;25(8):284. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508284. eCollection 2024 Aug. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39228505 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation and consistency between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery function in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective observational study.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e082913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082913. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39179282 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve and Resting Full-Cycle Ratio in the Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 11;25(7):260. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507260. eCollection 2024 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39139424 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous