Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jan;125(1):49-56.
doi: 10.1002/lary.24901. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Operative utilization of balloon versus traditional endoscopic sinus surgery

Elisabeth H Ference  1 , Madeline Graber, David Conley, Rakesh K Chandra, Bruce K Tan, Charlesnika Evans, Melissa Pynnonen, Stephanie S Smith
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Operative utilization of balloon versus traditional endoscopic sinus surgery

Elisabeth H Ference et al. Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: To study the utilization of balloon catheter dilation (BCD) compared to traditional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis

Methods: Cases identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes as BCD (2,717) or traditional ESS (31,059) were extracted from the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases 2011 for California, Florida, Maryland, and New York. Patient demographics, surgical center and surgeon volume, mean charge, and operating room (OR) time were compared.

Results: There were 33,776 patients who underwent sinus surgery in the included states in 2011. Of these, 4.6% of maxillary, 5.6% of sphenoid, and 13.9% of frontal procedures were performed using BCD. Adjusted analyses found increased use of BCD in patients with chronic diseases(P < .001). Patients who had limited sinus surgery were less likely to have BCD compared to patients who had all four sinuses instrumented (P < .001). Surgeons who performed a medium (odds ratio 1.38 [1.14-1.65]) or high (odds ratio 1.71 [1.42-2.07]) volume of ESSs were more likely to use BCD compared to those who performed a low volume (P < .001). However, among surgeons who utilized BCD, there was a minimal relationship between the percentage of surgeries performed with BCD and the surgeon's total number of cases (R(2) = 0.055). Compared to traditional ESS, the median charges for maxillary/ethmoid procedures (mini-ESS) involving BCD were approximately $4,500 (P < .001) and maxillary/ethmoid/sphenoid/frontal procedures (pan-ESS) were approximately $2,950 (P = .003) greater, whereas the median OR time involving BCD was 8 minutes less for mini-ESS procedures(P = .01) but not statistically different for pan-ESS procedures (P = .58).

Conclusions: In the study sample, balloon technology was used in 8.0% of ESS cases in 2011. Procedures using BCD were on average more expensive compared to traditional ESS procedures, with minimal decrease in OR time.

Keywords: State Ambulatory Surgery Databases; balloon sinus dilation; cost; sinus surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Batra PS. Evidence-based practice: balloon catheter dilation in rhinology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;45(5):993–1004. - PubMed
    1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl. 2012 Mar;(23):3. preceding table of contents, 1–298. - PubMed
    1. Balloon sinus ostial dilation for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ. 2013 Apr;27(9):1–3. - PubMed
    1. Stewart AE, Vaughan WC. Balloon sinuplasty versus surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010 May;10(3):181–187. - PubMed
    1. Lanza D. Postoperative care and avoiding frontal recess stenosis. Paper presented at: The International Advanced Sinus Symposium; Philadelphia. 1993.

Publication types