Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method

Epidemiol Infect. 2015 May;143(7):1477-85. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814002246. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

Abstract

There exists an urgent need to develop iterative risk assessment strategies of zoonotic diseases. The aim of this study is to develop a method of prioritizing 98 zoonoses derived from animal pathogens in Japan and to involve four major groups of stakeholders: researchers, physicians, public health officials, and citizens. We used a combination of risk profiling and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Profiling risk was accomplished with semi-quantitative analysis of existing public health data. AHP data collection was performed by administering questionnaires to the four stakeholder groups. Results showed that researchers and public health officials focused on case fatality as the chief important factor, while physicians and citizens placed more weight on diagnosis and prevention, respectively. Most of the six top-ranked diseases were similar among all stakeholders. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, severe acute respiratory syndrome, and Ebola fever were ranked first, second, and third, respectively.

Keywords: zoonoses.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Female
  • Health Priorities*
  • Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Japan
  • Male
  • Prion Diseases / prevention & control
  • Public Health
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / prevention & control
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Zoonoses / prevention & control*