Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 7;111(40):14577-82.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410389111. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Structural basis for the mutual antagonism of cAMP and TRIP8b in regulating HCN channel function

Affiliations

Structural basis for the mutual antagonism of cAMP and TRIP8b in regulating HCN channel function

Andrea Saponaro et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

cAMP signaling in the brain mediates several higher order neural processes. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels directly bind cAMP through their cytoplasmic cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD), thus playing a unique role in brain function. Neuronal HCN channels are also regulated by tetratricopeptide repeat-containing Rab8b interacting protein (TRIP8b), an auxiliary subunit that antagonizes the effects of cAMP by interacting with the channel CNBD. To unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the dual regulation of HCN channel activity by cAMP/TRIP8b, we determined the NMR solution structure of the HCN2 channel CNBD in the cAMP-free form and mapped on it the TRIP8b interaction site. We reconstruct here the full conformational changes induced by cAMP binding to the HCN channel CNBD. Our results show that TRIP8b does not compete with cAMP for the same binding region; rather, it exerts its inhibitory action through an allosteric mechanism, preventing the cAMP-induced conformational changes in the HCN channel CNBD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
cAMP-free structure of the human HCN2 CNBD and comparison with the bound structure. (A) Ribbon representation of the cAMP-free CNBD structure (orange). For better visualization of the structure, only one conformation of the unstructured C-terminal part of the C-helix (residues 659–663) is shown, whereas the unfolded region at the N terminus of the construct (residues 521–532) and the stretch following the C-helix (residues 664–672) are not shown. Secondary structure elements are labeled. (B) Ribbon representation of the X-ray cAMP-bound CNBD structure (gray) [PDB ID code 1Q5O (ref. 16)]. The cAMP molecule is shown in stick representation in black. (C) Superposition of the cAMP-free and cAMP-bound structures of the CNBD.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Conformational changes in the helical components following cyclic nucleotide binding to the CNBD. (A) Close-up view of the PBC. The phosphate-sugar moiety of cAMP binds to the PBC, inducing its rearrangement. In the absence of cAMP, Leu612 of PBC occupies the space that is filled by Phe638 of the B-helix in the cAMP-bound conformation. (B) Highlighted in red is the portion of the PBC loop that folds into αP upon cAMP binding. (C) Translational movement of the B- and C-helices moving as a rigid body toward the cAMP molecule bound to the PBC. (D) Folding of the C-terminal portion of the C-helix from Arg659 to Ile663 (shown in red). cAMP apolar interactions with the side chains of Arg659 and Ile663 are represented as dotted spheres. (E) Close-up view of the N-terminal helical bundle (αE′–turn–αA). The cAMP-induced movement of the B- and C-helices element forces the N-terminal helical bundle to adopt a new position. (F) Red-marked loop between αE′ and αA folds into αF′.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Proposed binding region for TRIP8bcore on the HCN2 CNBD. A ribbon representation of the CNBD shows in red the residues whose amide proton (NH) signals were perturbed upon the addition of TRIP8bcore. van der Waals volumes are reported for the perturbed residues in the N-bundle loop and in the C-helix. For simplicity, only one conformation of the unstructured region of the C-helix (residues 659–663) is shown. The N- and C-terminal regions of the construct are omitted as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Contribution of the N-bundle loop and the C-helix/stretch to the TRIP8b binding site. (A, Lower) Bacterial lysates from cells coexpressing Strep-tagged TRIP8bcore (blue arrowhead) and His6-MBP–tagged CNBD WT and mutants (green arrowhead) were loaded onto a Strep-tactin affinity column for Strep-tag purification. Eluted samples were analyzed by Coomassie Blue staining following SDS/PAGE separation. Numbers on the left indicate molecular mass markers (kDa), loaded in the first lane. Lane 1 contains CNBDΔN. Lane 2 contains CNBDΔC. Lanes 3–5 contain mutants obtained by progressive truncation of the C-helix. A stop codon was introduced after the following residues: Ala651 (lane 3), Ile657 (lane 4), and Ile663 (lane 5). Pro646 and Ile663 correspond to the first and last amino acids of the C-helix, respectively. Lanes 6 and 7 contain mutants obtained by progressive truncation of the stretch following the C-helix. A stop codon was introduced after the following residues: Lys666 (lane 6) and Ile669 (lane 7). Lane 8 contains K665E/K666E double-CNBD point mutant. (A, Upper) Sequence and cartoon representation of the C-helix/stretch are shown. Arrows indicate the last residue of the deletion constructs. Numbering of the arrows corresponds to gel lanes. (B) Coomassie Blue staining of the bacterial lysates before Strep-tactin affinity purification, showing an equivalent expression level of all the mutant constructs tested. The green arrowhead indicates the His6-MBP–tagged CNBD proteins. Lane numbers are as in A.

Comment in

  • Dynamic measurements for funny channels.
    Puljung MC. Puljung MC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 7;111(40):14320-1. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416137111. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 25249634 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biel M, Wahl-Schott C, Michalakis S, Zong X. Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: From genes to function. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(3):847–885. - PubMed
    1. Wainger BJ, DeGennaro M, Santoro B, Siegelbaum SA, Tibbs GR. Molecular mechanism of cAMP modulation of HCN pacemaker channels. Nature. 2001;411(6839):805–810. - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Wang J, Zhou L, George MS, Siegelbaum SA. Voltage sensor movement and cAMP binding allosterically regulate an inherently voltage-independent closed-open transition in HCN channels. J Gen Physiol. 2007;129(2):175–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craven KB, Zagotta WN. Salt bridges and gating in the COOH-terminal region of HCN2 and CNGA1 channels. J Gen Physiol. 2004;124(6):663–677. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craven KB, Olivier NB, Zagotta WN. C-terminal movement during gating in cyclic nucleotide-modulated channels. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(21):14728–14738. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data