Potential antidepressant overtreatment associated with office use of brief depression symptom measures
- PMID: 25201931
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.140038
Potential antidepressant overtreatment associated with office use of brief depression symptom measures
Abstract
Background: Use of brief depression symptom measures for identifying or screening cases may help to address depression undertreatment, but whether it also leads to diagnosis and treatment of patients with few or no symptoms-a group unlikely to have major depression or benefit from antidepressants-is unknown. We examined the associations of use of a brief depression symptom measure with depression diagnosis and antidepressant recommendation and prescription among patients with few or no depression symptoms.
Methods: We conducted exploratory observational analyses of data from a randomized trial of depression engagement interventions conducted in primary care offices in California. Analyses focused on participants scoring <10 on a study-administered 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (completed immediately before an office visit and not disclosed to the provider) with complete chart review data (n = 595). We reviewed visit notes for evidence of practice administration of a brief symptom measure (independent of the trial) and whether the provider (1) diagnosed depression or (2) recommended and/or prescribed an antidepressant.
Results: Among the 545 patients without a practice-administered measure, 57 (10.5%) had a visit diagnosis of depression; 9 (1.6%) were recommended and another 21 (3.8%) prescribed an antidepressant. Among the 50 patients (8.4% of total sample) with a practice-administered measure, 10 (20%) had a visit diagnosis of depression; 6 (12%) were recommended and another 6 (12%) prescribed an antidepressant. Adjusting for nesting within providers, trial intervention, stratification variables, and sample weighting, use of a brief symptom measure was associated with depression diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-9.2) and antidepressant recommendation and/or prescription (adjusted odds ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-13.9). Analyses using progressively lower PHQ-9 thresholds (<9 to <5) and examining antidepressant prescription alone yielded consistent findings. Analyses by practice-administered measure (PHQ-9 vs PHQ-2) indicated the study findings were largely associated with PHQ-9 use.
Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest administration of brief depression symptom measures, particularly the PHQ-9, may be associated with depression diagnosis and antidepressant recommendation and prescription among patients unlikely to have major depression. If these findings are confirmed, researchers should investigate the balance of benefits and risks (eg, overdiagnosis of depression and overtreatment with antidepressants) associated with use of a brief symptom measure.
Keywords: Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Health Services Misuse.
© Copyright 2014 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Do patient requests for antidepressants enhance or hinder physicians' evaluation of depression? A randomized controlled trial.Med Care. 2006 Dec;44(12):1107-13. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000237202.96962.fd. Med Care. 2006. PMID: 17122715 Clinical Trial.
-
National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;67(1):26-36. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.175. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010. PMID: 20048220
-
Screening for depression and suicidality in a VA primary care setting: 2 items are better than 1 item.Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):839-45. Am J Manag Care. 2004. PMID: 15609737 Clinical Trial.
-
Does the FDA proposed list of possible correlates of suicidality associated with antidepressants apply to an adult private practice population?J Affect Disord. 2006 Aug;94(1-3):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jun 12. J Affect Disord. 2006. PMID: 16766043 Review.
-
Physician actions following a positive PHQ-2: implications for the implementation of depression screening in family medicine practice.Fam Syst Health. 2015 Mar;33(1):18-27. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000089. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Fam Syst Health. 2015. PMID: 25485822 Review.
Cited by
-
Global Burden Disease Estimates for Major Depressive Disorders (MDD): A review of diagnostic instruments used in studies of prevalence.Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01302-6. Online ahead of print. Community Ment Health J. 2024. PMID: 38951416
-
Toward an Extended Definition of Major Depressive Disorder Symptomatology: Digital Assessment and Cross-validation Study.JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 28;5(10):e27908. doi: 10.2196/27908. JMIR Form Res. 2021. PMID: 34709182 Free PMC article.
-
Drivers of and Solutions for the Overuse of Antidepressant Medication in Pediatric Populations.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 13;11:17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00017. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32116838 Free PMC article.
-
Does industry-sponsored education foster overdiagnosis and overtreatment of depression, osteoporosis and over-active bladder syndrome? An Australian cohort study.BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 13;8(2):e019027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019027. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29440213 Free PMC article.
-
Selective Cutoff Reporting in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Comparison of Conventional and Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analyses of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Screening Tool.Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 15;185(10):954-964. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww191. Am J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28419203 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical