Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Mar;26(3):885-90.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2887-y. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

Distribution of vertebral fractures varies among patients according to hip fracture type

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Distribution of vertebral fractures varies among patients according to hip fracture type

J Watt et al. Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

This study explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in hip fracture patients. Unlike patients with intertrochanteric fractures, those with subcapital fractures were less likely to have vertebral fractures in the T4-T10 region of the spine. The dissimilar distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with intertrochanteric and subcapital fractures may indicate different underlying etiologies.

Introduction: There are two main types of hip fractures: intertrochanteric and subcapital. Both types can have associated vertebral fractures. In this study, we explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in the two hip fracture populations.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a convenience sample of 120 patients: 40 with subcapital fractures and vertebral fractures, 40 with intertrochanteric fractures and vertebral fractures, and 40 with vertebral fractures only. Based on Genant's semiquantitative assessment method of radiographic images, the distribution and severity of each patient's vertebral fractures were explored [1].

Results: Patients with subcapital fractures had significantly fewer total vertebral fractures (93 vs. 144, p = 0.005; 93 vs. 127, p = 0.019), vertebral fractures from T4 to T10 (41 vs. 81, p = 0.005; 41 vs. 64, p = 0.042), and vertebral fractures at the T7-T8 peak (11 vs. 31, p = 0.002; 11 vs. 30, p = 0.003) than patients with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone, respectively, and they were more likely to have only one vertebral fracture (15 vs. 3, p < 0.001; 15 vs. 2, p < 0.001). The number of vertebral fractures from T11 to L4 and at the T12-L1 peak did not differ among the groups. The numbers of fractures at each vertebral level was significantly correlated only between those with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone (r = 0.65, p = 0.009).

Conclusion: The distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with subcapital fractures differed from the other fracture groups, which may indicate that subcapital fractures and some lumbar fractures have a different underlying etiology than intertrochanteric fractures and thoracic (T4-T10) fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Osteoporos Int. 1991 Feb;1(2):81-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Jul;7(7):755-9 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1151-9 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Jul;11(7):984-96 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Feb;17(2):231-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources