The patient burden of screening mammography recall
- PMID: 25247382
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.1511
The patient burden of screening mammography recall
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the burden of direct and indirect costs borne by recalled patients after a false positive screening mammogram.
Methods: Women aged 40-75 years undergoing screening mammography were identified from a U.S. commercial claims database. Women were required to have 12 months pre- and 6 months post-index enrollment to identify utilization and exclude patients with subsequent cancer diagnoses. Recall was defined as the use of diagnostic mammography or breast ultrasound during 6 months post-index. Descriptive statistics were presented for recalled and non-recalled patients; differences were compared using the chi square test. Out-of-pocket costs were totaled by utilization type and in aggregate for all recall utilization.
Results: Of 1,723,139 patients with a mammography screening that were not diagnosed with breast cancer, 259,028 (15.0%) were recalled. Significant demographic differences were observed between recalled and non-recalled patients. The strongest drivers of patient costs were image-guided biopsy (mean $351 among 11.8% utilizing), diagnostic mammography ($50; 80.1%), and ultrasound ($58; 65.7%), which accounted for 29.9%, 29.0%, and 27.5% of total recall costs, respectively. For many patients the entire cost of recall utilization was covered by the health plan. Total costs were substantially greater among patients with biopsy; one-third of all patients experienced multiple days of recall utilization.
Conclusion: After a false positive screening mammography, recalled women incurred both direct medical costs and indirect time costs. The cost burden for women with employer-based insurance was dependent upon the type of utilization and extent of health plan coverage. Additional research and technologies are needed to address the entirety of the recall burden in diverse populations of women.
Similar articles
-
Understanding patient options, utilization patterns, and burdens associated with breast cancer screening.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.1510. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014. PMID: 25247383 Review.
-
Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24295942
-
Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11S):R81-R88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.032. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27814820
-
The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.Clin Breast Cancer. 2001 Jul;2(2):145-52. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2001.n.019. Clin Breast Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11899786
-
Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:605-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.003133. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993. PMID: 8323604 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Global Radiomic Features from Mammography for Predicting Difficult-To-Interpret Normal Cases.J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1541-1552. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00836-7. Epub 2023 May 30. J Digit Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37253894 Free PMC article.
-
The utilization of artificial intelligence applications to improve breast cancer detection and prognosis.Saudi Med J. 2023 Feb;44(2):119-127. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.2.20220611. Saudi Med J. 2023. PMID: 36773967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Acad Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 25. Acad Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35562265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Second-Generation Digital Health Platforms: Placing the Patient at the Center and Focusing on Clinical Outcomes.Front Digit Health. 2020 Dec 3;2:569178. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.569178. eCollection 2020. Front Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 34713042 Free PMC article.
-
Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection.Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99582-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34635726 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

