Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting
- PMID: 25248524
- DOI: 10.3233/WOR-141945
Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting
Abstract
Background: Little research is available on low back biomechanical stresses that obese and overweight workers experience from manual load lifting.
Objective: The study objective was to quantitatively evaluate low back biomechanical stresses of severely obese (BMI≥35 kg/m2) workers during manual lifts of moderate load weights.
Method: Twenty severely obese and 20 normal weight participants performed infrequent lifting in 16 task conditions. In each task condition, NIOSH recommended load weights were computed for the origin and destination of lift and were employed as the load weights. Optical motion capture was performed to collect lifting posture data. For each participant and each lifting condition, L5/S1 disc compression forces were computed at the origin and destination of lift using a static low back biomechanical model.
Results: The L5/S1 disc compression forces estimated for the severely obese participants ranged from 3000N to 8500N and many exceeded the 3400N NIOSH action limit by large margins. Group mean disc compression force was significantly larger for the severely obese than the normal weight group.
Conclusion: In light of previous research on spine, bone and obesity, the study results seem to suggest that severely obese individuals are likely at an increased risk of lifting-related low back pain compared with normal weight individuals.
Keywords: Corpulence; L5/S1 disc compression force; low back pain; manual materials handling; overweight.
Similar articles
-
Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.J Biomech. 2009 Jan 5;42(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.013. Epub 2008 Dec 12. J Biomech. 2009. PMID: 19084840 Clinical Trial.
-
Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):191-202. doi: 10.1177/0018720818795038. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Hum Factors. 2019. PMID: 30222936
-
Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting.J Biomech. 1985;18(12):877-85. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90032-6. J Biomech. 1985. PMID: 4077856
-
Low back load in airport baggage handlers.Dan Med J. 2016 Apr;63(4):B5233. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27034189 Review.
-
A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1125-44. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966879. Ergonomics. 1989. PMID: 2680481 Review.
Cited by
-
A new perspective on intervertebral disc calcification-from bench to bedside.Bone Res. 2024 Jan 22;12(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00307-3. Bone Res. 2024. PMID: 38253615 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Weight-centric treatment of depression and chronic pain.Obes Pillars. 2022 Jun 23;3:100025. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100025. eCollection 2022 Sep. Obes Pillars. 2022. PMID: 37990725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of relative weight limit set as a body weight percentage on work-related low back pain among workers.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 19;18(4):e0284465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284465. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37075010 Free PMC article.
-
Causal relationships of obesity on musculoskeletal chronic pain: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 23;13:971997. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.971997. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36082069 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of body mass index on opioid consumption in lumbar spine fusion surgery.N Am Spine Soc J. 2021 Apr 8;6:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100060. eCollection 2021 Jun. N Am Spine Soc J. 2021. PMID: 35141625 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
