Ocular itch relief with alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis: pooled analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials

Adv Ther. 2014 Oct;31(10):1059-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0155-3. Epub 2014 Sep 27.

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of the once-daily topical ophthalmic solutions, alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine 0.2%, in preventing ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis were evaluated.

Methods: Pooled analysis was conducted of two double-masked, multicenter, active- and placebo-controlled studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model of allergic conjunctivitis. Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive alcaftadine 0.25%, olopatadine 0.2%, or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was subject-evaluated mean ocular itching at 3 min post-CAC and 16 h after treatment instillation. Secondary measures included ocular itching at 5 and 7 min post-CAC. Ocular itch was determined over all time points measured (3, 5, and 7 min) post-CAC and the proportion of subjects with minimal itch (itch score<1) and zero itch (itch score=0) was also assessed.

Results: A total of 284 subjects were enrolled in the two studies. At 3 min post-CAC and 16 h after treatment instillation, alcaftadine 0.25% achieved a significantly lower mean itch score compared with olopatadine 0.2% (0.50 vs. 0.87, respectively; P=0.0006). Alcaftadine demonstrated a significantly lower mean itch score over all time points compared with olopatadine (0.68 vs. 0.92, respectively; P=0.0390); both alcaftadine- and olopatadine-treated subjects achieved significantly lower overall mean ocular itching scores compared with placebo (2.10; P<0.0001 for both actives). Minimal itch over all time points was reported by 76.1% of alcaftadine-treated subjects compared with 58.1% of olopatadine-treated subjects (P=0.0121). Treatment with alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine 0.2% was safe and well tolerated; no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Once-daily alcaftadine 0.25% ophthalmic solution demonstrated greater efficacy in prevention of ocular itching compared with olopatadine 0.2% at 3 min post-CAC (primary endpoint), and over all time points, 16 h post-treatment instillation. Alcaftadine and olopatadine both provided effective relief compared with placebo and were generally well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01470118 NCT01732757.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Allergens*
  • Anti-Allergic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Allergic Agents / adverse effects
  • Benzazepines* / administration & dosage
  • Benzazepines* / adverse effects
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic* / complications
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic* / diagnosis
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic* / drug therapy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Monitoring
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imidazoles* / administration & dosage
  • Imidazoles* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Olopatadine Hydrochloride* / administration & dosage
  • Olopatadine Hydrochloride* / adverse effects
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Pruritus / etiology
  • Pruritus / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Allergens
  • Anti-Allergic Agents
  • Benzazepines
  • Imidazoles
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Olopatadine Hydrochloride
  • alcaftadine

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01470118
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01732757