Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep 29;13:97.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-97.

Effects of high-protein vs. high- fat snacks on appetite control, satiety, and eating initiation in healthy women

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of high-protein vs. high- fat snacks on appetite control, satiety, and eating initiation in healthy women

Laura C Ortinau et al. Nutr J. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a high-protein afternoon yogurt snack improves appetite control, satiety, and reduces subsequent food intake compared to other commonly-consumed, energy dense, high-fat snacks.

Findings: Twenty, healthy women (age: 27 ± 2 y; BMI: 23.4 ± 0.7 kg/m2) completed the randomized crossover design study which included 3, 8-h testing days comparing the following 160 kcal afternoon snacks: high-protein yogurt (14 g protein/25 g CHO/0 g fat); high-fat crackers (0 g protein/19 g CHO/9 g fat); and high-fat chocolate (2 g protein/19 g CHO/9 g fat). Participants were acclimated to each snack for 3 consecutive days. On day 4, the participants consumed a standardized breakfast and lunch; the respective snack was consumed 3-h post-lunch. Perceived hunger and fullness were assessed throughout the afternoon until dinner was voluntarily requested. An ad libitum dinner was then provided. The consumption of the yogurt snack led to greater reductions in afternoon hunger vs. chocolate (p < 0.01). No differences in afternoon fullness were detected. The yogurt snack also delayed eating initiation by approximately 30 min compared to the chocolate snack (p < 0.01) and approximately 20 min vs. crackers (p = 0.07). The yogurt snack led to approximately 100 fewer kcals consumed at dinner vs. the crackers (p = 0.08) and chocolate (p < 0.05). No other differences were detected.

Conclusion: These data suggest that, when compared to high-fat snacks, eating less energy dense, high-protein snacks like yogurt improves appetite control, satiety, and reduces subsequent food intake in healthy women.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Appetite and satiety. Perceived hunger (A) and fullness (B) assessed from the time of snack consumption (▲) until voluntary dinner request in 20 healthy women. The post-snack net incremental area under the curve (AUC) is illustrated in the bar graphs. Data are represented as means ± SEM; Different letters denotes significance p<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ad libitum dinner intake following the consumption of each the afternoon snacks in 20 healthy women. Data are represented as means ± SEM; Different letters denotes significance p<0.05, except for *Yogurt vs. Chocolate, p=0.08.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Piernas C, Popkin BM. Snacking increased among U.S. adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr. 2010;140:325–332. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.112763. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piernas C, Popkin BM. Increased portion sizes from energy-dense foods affect total energy intake at eating occasions in US children and adolescents: patterns and trends by age group and sociodemographic characteristics, 1977–2006. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1324–1332. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.008466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977–2006. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rolls BJ. The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2009;97:609–615. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leidy HJ. Increased dietary protein as a dietary strategy to prevent and/or treat obesity. Mo Med. 2014;111:54–58. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types