National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis
- PMID: 25277608
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958
National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis
Abstract
Background: The number of alternatives to intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the treatment of anticipated and established acute circulatory failure is growing. Despite the clinical importance and significant cost of short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, the state of their present use has not been analyzed on a national scale.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the demographics, treatment practices, survival rates, and cost of short-term MCS.
Methods: In this serial cross-sectional study, we analyzed all adult patients receiving short-term MCS in the United States from 2004 to 2011 by using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
Results: From 2007 to 2011, use of percutaneous devices for short-term MCS increased by 1,511% compared with a 101% increase in nonpercutaneous devices. Mortality rates declined over this period (p for trend = 0.027) from 41.1% in 2004 to 2007 to 33.4% in 2008 to 2011. A similar trend was observed for the subset of patients with cardiogenic shock, decreasing from 51.6% to 43.1% (p for trend = 0.012). Hospital costs also declined over this period (p for trend = 0.011). Multivariable analysis revealed balloon pumps (odds ratio [OR]: 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58 to 2.52), coagulopathy (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.88 to 2.94), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR: 3.50; 95% CI: 2.20 to 5.57) before short-term MCS were among the most significant predictors of mortality.
Conclusions: Use of short-term MCS in the United States has increased rapidly, whereas rates of in-hospital mortality have decreased. These changes have taken place in the context of declining hospital costs associated with short-term MCS.
Keywords: heart failure; left ventricular assist device; percutaneous devices; shock.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The changing landscape of advanced heart failure therapeutics.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 7;64(14):1416-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.085. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25277609 No abstract available.
-
Short-term mechanical circulatory support: the problem of the uninsured.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 17;65(10):1062-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.063. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25766959 No abstract available.
-
Administrative data: proceed with caution.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 17;65(10):1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.078. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25766960 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2152-e2159. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947. EuroIntervention. 2018. PMID: 29400657
-
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29134345
-
Cardiogenic shock during heart failure hospitalizations: Age-, sex-, and race-stratified trends in incidence and outcomes.Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Apr 11. Am Heart J. 2019. PMID: 31078113
-
Cardiac extracorporeal life support: state of the art in 2007.Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:104-15. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001217. Cardiol Young. 2007. PMID: 18039404 Review.
-
Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.Heart Fail Clin. 2015 Apr;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Heart Fail Clin. 2015. PMID: 25834971 Review.
Cited by
-
SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Classification for Predicting In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality in Acute Heart Failure.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Oct 1;1(6):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100496. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022. PMID: 39132349 Free PMC article.
-
Bridge to Life: Current Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart-Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 14;13(14):4120. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144120. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 30;13(9):2642. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092642. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38731171 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute Heart Failure: From The Emergency Department to the Intensive Care Unit.Cardiol Clin. 2024 May;42(2):165-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Cardiol Clin. 2024. PMID: 38631788 Review.
-
Steady Flow Left Ventricle Unloading Is Superior to Pulsatile Pressure Augmentation Venting During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.ASAIO J. 2024 Nov 1;70(11):929-937. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002208. Epub 2024 Apr 8. ASAIO J. 2024. PMID: 38588597
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
