Long term survival with thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy: propensity matched comparative analysis using SEER-Medicare database
- PMID: 25277994
- PMCID: PMC4183188
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5575
Long term survival with thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy: propensity matched comparative analysis using SEER-Medicare database
Abstract
Objective: To compare long term survival after minimally invasive lobectomy and thoracotomy lobectomy.
Design: Propensity matched analysis.
Setting: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database.
Participants: All patients with lung cancer from 2007 to 2009 undergoing lobectomy.
Main outcome measure: Influence of less invasive thoracoscopic surgery on overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer specific survival.
Results: From 2007 to 2009, 6008 patients undergoing lobectomy were identified (n=4715 (78%) thoracotomy). The median age of the entire cohort was 74 (interquartile range 70-78) years. The median length of follow-up for entire group was 40 months. In a matched analysis of 1195 patients in each treatment category, no statistical differences in three year overall survival, disease-free survival, or cancer specific survival were found between the groups (overall survival: 70.6% v 68.1%, P=0.55; disease-free survival: 86.2% v 85.4%, P=0.46; cancer specific survival: 92% v 89.5%, P=0.05).
Conclusion: This propensity matched analysis showed that patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy had similar overall, cancer specific, and disease-free survival compared with patients undergoing thoracotomy lobectomy. Thoracoscopic techniques do not seem to compromise these measures of outcome after lobectomy.
© Paul et al 2014.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures
Comment in
-
Minimally invasive thoracic surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.BMJ. 2014 Oct 2;349:g5849. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5849. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 25277995 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer.Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):943-9; discussion 949-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 16. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23684159
-
Long-term survival after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):951-60; discussion 960-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.104. Epub 2013 Jul 16. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23866808
-
Sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer with N1 nodal disease does not compromise survival.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Nov 6. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24206972 Free PMC article.
-
Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):2008-16; discussion 2016-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.009. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 19022040 Review.
-
Overall Survival Following Thoracoscopic vs Open Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Spring;29(1):104-112. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28683985 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes following minimally invasive approaches vs. open extended lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):334-344. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-37. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 38496690 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive clinical and dosimetric parameters for risk of relapse in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated by SBRT: A large single institution experience.Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jan 3;45:100720. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100720. eCollection 2024 Mar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38288310 Free PMC article.
-
Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer in a mixed practice medium-volume hospital: a propensity-matched study.Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec 5;37(6):ivad189. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad189. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 38011678 Free PMC article.
-
Ground glass opacity resection extent assessment trial (GREAT): A study protocol of multi-institutional, prospective, open-label, randomized phase III trial of minimally invasive segmentectomy versus lobectomy for ground glass opacity (GGO)-containing early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1052796. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1052796. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36741022 Free PMC article.
-
The three steps method for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jan 10;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02129-0. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 36627665 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Lung cancer: the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. NICE, 2011.
-
- Treasure T, Russell C, Morton D, Macbeth F, Utley M. Surgical resection of lung cancer England: more operations but no trials to test their effectiveness. Thorax 2012;67:759-61. - PubMed
-
- Treasure T, Russell C, Morton D, Macbeth F, Utley M. Surgical resection of lung cancer in England: more operations but no trials to test their effectiveness. Thorax 2013;68:187-8. - PubMed
-
- Riaz SP, Luchtenborg M, Jack RH, Coupland VH, Linklater KM, Peake MD, et al. Variation in surgical resection for lung cancer in relation to survival: population-based study in England 2004-2006. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:54-60. - PubMed
-
- Riaz SP, Linklater KM, Page R, Peake MD, Moller H, Luchtenborg M. Recent trends in resection rates among non-small cell lung cancer patients in England. Thorax 2012;67:811-4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical