Efficacy of do-it-yourself whitening as compared to conventional tooth whitening modalities: an in vitro study
- PMID: 25279797
- DOI: 10.2341/13-333-LR
Efficacy of do-it-yourself whitening as compared to conventional tooth whitening modalities: an in vitro study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of do-it-yourself (DIY) whitening as compared to conventional tooth whitening modalities using different shade assessment tools.
Methods and materials: Extracted human molars (120) were randomly distributed to six groups (n=20). Whitening was performed according to manufacturer's directions for over-the-counter, dentist-dispensed for home use, and in-office whitening. DIY whitening consisted of a strawberry and baking soda mix. Additionally, negative and positive controls were used. Two evaluators used the Vita Classical (VC) and Vita Bleachedguide 3D-Master with interpolated numbers (BGi) for visual assessment at baseline and one-week, one-month, and three-month postwhitening. Instrumental measurements were performed with a spectrophotometer. Kruskal-Wallis procedure was used to assess color changes among groups and intraclass correlation (ICC) to evaluate agreement between evaluators.
Results: DIY exhibited lower color change (ΔSGUVC, ΔSGUBGi, ΔE*, where SGU = shade guide unit and E = overall color change) compared to other whitening groups at all time points (p<0.05). ICC demonstrated very good agreement between evaluators with VC and BGi at each time point. Both shade guides were related with each other and strongly related to instrumental measurements (p<0.05).
Conclusions: DIY whitening was the least effective whitening modality. Both VC and BGi are related with each other and have good correlation with instrumental measurements.
Similar articles
-
Effect of various tooth whitening modalities on microhardness, surface roughness and surface morphology of the enamel.Odontology. 2015 Sep;103(3):274-9. doi: 10.1007/s10266-014-0163-4. Epub 2014 Jun 28. Odontology. 2015. PMID: 24972882
-
Evaluation of bleaching efficacy and erosion potential of four different over-the-counter bleaching products.Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):356-60. Am J Dent. 2013. PMID: 24640442
-
A clinical study comparing the efficacy and sensitivity of home vs combined whitening.Oper Dent. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):460-6. doi: 10.2341/10-159-C. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Oper Dent. 2011. PMID: 21859318 Clinical Trial.
-
Review of the effectiveness of various tooth whitening systems.Oper Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):230-5. doi: 10.2341/08-74. Oper Dent. 2009. PMID: 19363980 Review.
-
Tooth whitening: what we now know.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014 Jun;14 Suppl:70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 13. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014. PMID: 24929591 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laboratory model to evaluate efficacy of an experimental titanium oxide nanofibers bleaching agent.Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Sep 2;46(4):e47. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e47. eCollection 2021 Nov. Restor Dent Endod. 2021. PMID: 34909411 Free PMC article.
-
Bleaching in vital teeth: Combined treatment vs in-office treatment.J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Aug 1;11(8):e754-e758. doi: 10.4317/jced.56079. eCollection 2019 Aug. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019. PMID: 31598205 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
