National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009
- PMID: 25281920
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.026
National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009
Abstract
Background context: Surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) remains controversial. Options include anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior approach fusion procedures such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF), anterior and posterior lumbar fusion (APLF), and total disc replacement (TDR). However, the trends during the last decade are uncertain.
Purpose: To examine the trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar DDD on a national level.
Study design: A retrospective analysis of population-based national hospital discharge data collected for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).
Patient sample: In the NIS from 2000 to 2009, patients aged 18 years or older with primary diagnosis of lumbar/lumbosacral DDD who underwent surgical treatment were included.
Outcome measures: Trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar DDD.
Methods: Clinical data were derived from the NIS between 2000 and 2009. Patients aged 18 years or older with a primary diagnosis of lumbar/lumbosacral DDD who underwent spinal fusion or TDR were identified. Data regarding patient- and health care system-related characteristics were retrieved and analyzed.
Results: A total of 380,305 patients underwent surgical treatment for lumbar DDD between 2000 and 2009. Population adjusted incidence increased 2.4-fold from 2000 to 2009. Among the procedures, APLF increased 3.0-fold and PLIF/PLF increased 2.8-fold. Total disc replacement did not increase significantly. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed in 16.8% of patients, PLIF/PLF in 67.9%, APLF in 13.6%, and TDR in 1.8%. Surgical treatment for lumbar DDD was 1.8 times more common in the Midwest region and 1.7 times more common in the South region than in the Northeast region. Total disc replacement was more common in younger patients and in the Northeast region. Poterior lumbar interbody fusion/PLF was more common in older patients and in the South region.
Conclusions: During the last decade, surgical treatment for lumbar DDD has increased 2.4-fold in the United States. Although all fusion procedures significantly increased, TDR did not increase. Surgical treatment for lumbar DDD was more common in the Midwest and South regions. Trends in the procedures were different depending on the age group and hospital region.
Keywords: Lumbar degenerative disc disease; Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Spinal fusion; Surgical treatment; Total disc replacement; Trend.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: still more questions than answers.Spine J. 2015 Feb 1;15(2):272-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.004. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25598279
Similar articles
-
Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States.Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 31. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 24184652
-
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010. PMID: 20447355 Czech.
-
Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine: results with a 2-year follow-up.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 1;39(15):E894-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000393. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24825156
-
Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):67-74. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24980588 Review.
-
Advanced meta-analyses comparing the three surgical techniques total disc replacement, anterior stand-alone fusion and circumferential fusion regarding pain, function and complications up to 3 years to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease.Eur Spine J. 2021 Dec;30(12):3688-3701. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06784-6. Epub 2021 Apr 10. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33837832 Review.
Cited by
-
Educating residents in spine surgery: A study of Entrustable professional activities in neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery.PLoS One. 2024 Oct 4;19(10):e0311444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311444. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39365796 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Interspinous Process Devices in Managing Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):5160. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175160. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations: is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 25;12:1411958. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411958. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39119273 Free PMC article.
-
One- and 2-year outcomes of lumbar facet arthroplasty versus spinal fusion in young (<65 years) and old (≥65 years) patients for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis.N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 May 16;19:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100329. eCollection 2024 Sep. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024. PMID: 38989291 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference in functional status for elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02356-9. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 38365668 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
