The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit?
- PMID: 25309530
- PMCID: PMC4176458
- DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00510
The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit?
Abstract
Microbial associations are integral to all eukaryotes. Mutualism, the interaction of two species for the benefit of both, is an important aspect of microbial associations, with evidence that multicellular organisms in particular benefit from microbes. However, the microbe's perspective has largely been ignored, and it is unknown whether most microbial symbionts benefit from their associations with hosts. It has been presumed that microbial symbionts receive host-derived nutrients or a competition-free environment with reduced predation, but there have been few empirical tests, or even critical assessments, of these assumptions. We evaluate these hypotheses based on available evidence, which indicate reduced competition and predation are not universal benefits for symbionts. Some symbionts do receive nutrients from their host, but this has not always been linked to a corresponding increase in symbiont fitness. We recommend experiments to test symbiont fitness using current experimental systems of symbiosis and detail considerations for other systems. Incorporating symbiont fitness into symbiosis research will provide insight into the evolution of mutualistic interactions and cooperation in general.
Keywords: endosymbiosis; host–microbe interactions; microbial fitness; mutualism; symbiont transmission.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impacts of host association and perturbation on symbiont fitness.Symbiosis. 2024;92(3):439-451. doi: 10.1007/s13199-024-00984-6. Epub 2024 Apr 2. Symbiosis. 2024. PMID: 38666134 Free PMC article.
-
Mutualism at the leading edge: insights into the eco-evolutionary dynamics of host-symbiont communities during range expansion.J Math Biol. 2024 Feb 2;88(2):24. doi: 10.1007/s00285-023-02037-w. J Math Biol. 2024. PMID: 38308102
-
It takes a village: ecological and fitness impacts of multipartite mutualism.Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67:161-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155723. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23799814 Review.
-
The role of defensive symbionts in host-parasite coevolution.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Nov;93(4):1747-1764. doi: 10.1111/brv.12417. Epub 2018 Apr 16. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018. PMID: 29663622 Review.
-
More Is Not Always Better: Coinfections with Defensive Symbionts Generate Highly Variable Outcomes.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Feb 18;86(5):e02537-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02537-19. Print 2020 Feb 18. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 31862723 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evolution of animal immunity in the light of beneficial symbioses.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 28;375(1808):20190601. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0601. Epub 2020 Aug 10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32772666 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Drosophila melanogaster establishes a species-specific mutualistic interaction with stable gut-colonizing bacteria.PLoS Biol. 2018 Jul 5;16(7):e2005710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005710. eCollection 2018 Jul. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 29975680 Free PMC article.
-
The impacts of host association and perturbation on symbiont fitness.Symbiosis. 2024;92(3):439-451. doi: 10.1007/s13199-024-00984-6. Epub 2024 Apr 2. Symbiosis. 2024. PMID: 38666134 Free PMC article.
-
Q&A: Friends (but sometimes foes) within: the complex evolutionary ecology of symbioses between host and microbes.BMC Biol. 2017 Dec 27;15(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0455-6. BMC Biol. 2017. PMID: 29282064 Free PMC article.
-
Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis between social amoebae and bacteria.Elife. 2018 Dec 31;7:e42660. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42660. Elife. 2018. PMID: 30596477 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahmadjian V. (1993). The Lichen Symbiosis. New York: John Wiley and Sons
-
- Baker A. C., Romanski A. M. (2007). Multiple symbiotic partnerships are common in scleractinian corals, but not in octocorals: comment on Goulet (2006). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 335 237–242 10.3354/meps335237 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
