Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 21;161(8):554-61.
doi: 10.7326/M14-0865.

3D-CAM: derivation and validation of a 3-minute diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium: a cross-sectional diagnostic test study

3D-CAM: derivation and validation of a 3-minute diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium: a cross-sectional diagnostic test study

Edward R Marcantonio et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 18;161(10):764

Abstract

Background: Delirium is common, leads to other adverse outcomes, and is costly. However, it often remains unrecognized in most clinical settings. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is the most widely used diagnostic algorithm, and operationalizing its features would be a substantial advance for clinical care.

Objective: To derive the 3D-CAM, a new 3-minute diagnostic assessment for CAM-defined delirium, and validate it against a clinical reference standard.

Design: Derivation and validation study.

Setting: 4 general medicine units in an academic medical center.

Participants: 201 inpatients aged 75 years or older.

Measurements: 20 items that best operationalized the 4 CAM diagnostic features were identified to create the 3D-CAM. For prospective validation, 3D-CAM assessments were administered by trained research assistants. Clinicians independently did an extensive assessment, including patient and family interviews and medical record reviews. These data were considered by an expert panel to determine the presence or absence of delirium and dementia (reference standard). The 3D-CAM delirium diagnosis was compared with the reference standard in all patients and subgroups with and without dementia.

Results: The 201 participants in the prospective validation study had a mean age of 84 years, and 28% had dementia. The expert panel identified 21% with delirium, 88% of whom had hypoactive or normal psychomotor features. Median administration time for the 3D-CAM was 3 minutes (interquartile range, 2 to 5 minutes), sensitivity was 95% (95% CI, 84% to 99%), and specificity was 94% (CI, 90% to 97%). The 3D-CAM did well in patients with dementia (sensitivity, 96% [CI, 82% to 100%]; specificity, 86% [CI, 67% to 96%]) and without dementia (sensitivity, 93% [CI, 66% to 100%]; specificity, 96% [CI, 91% to 99%]).

Limitation: Limited to single-center, cross-sectional, and medical patients only.

Conclusion: The 3D-CAM operationalizes the CAM algorithm using a 3-minute structured assessment with high sensitivity and specificity relative to a reference standard and could be an important tool for improving recognition of delirium.

Primary funding source: National Institute on Aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicts: None declared—the authors retained full autonomy in carrying out this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of 3D-CAM Assessment
This figure depicts the CAM diagnostic algorithm, with the 3D-CAM items and scoring summarized under each CAM diagnostic feature.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prospective Validation Study Flow Diagram
*Presence or absence of delirium as determined by first 3D-CAM assessment was compared to the reference standard delirium diagnosis to assess validity, and to the second 3D-CAM assessment to assess inter-rater agreement All assessments were completed within 2 hours of each other, and results were strictly blinded from the other assessors

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marcantonio ER. In the clinic Delirium. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(11):ITC6. - PubMed
    1. Marcantonio ER. Postoperative delirium: a 76-year-old woman with delirium following surgery. JAMA. 2012;308(1):73–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941–8. - PubMed
    1. Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, Straus SE. Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments. JAMA. 2010;304(7):779–86. - PubMed

Publication types