Do clinicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters?: a multicenter observational study
- PMID: 25329204
- PMCID: PMC4997807
- DOI: 10.7326/M14-0703
Do clinicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters?: a multicenter observational study
Abstract
Background: Complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs) increase over time. Although early removal of unnecessary CVCs is important to prevent complications, the extent to which clinicians are aware that their patients have a CVC is unknown.
Objective: To assess how often clinicians were unaware of the presence of triple-lumen catheters or peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in hospitalized patients.
Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Setting: 3 academic medical centers in the United States.
Patients: Hospitalized medical patients in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings.
Measurements: To ascertain awareness of CVCs, whether a PICC or triple-lumen catheter was present was determined; clinicians were then queried about device presence. Differences in device awareness among clinicians were assessed by chi-square tests.
Results: 990 patients were evaluated, and 1881 clinician assessments were done. The overall prevalence of CVCs was 21.1% (n=209), of which 60.3% (126 of 209) were PICCs. A total of 21.2% (90 of 425) of clinicians interviewed were unaware of the presence of a CVC. Unawareness was greatest among patients with PICCs, where 25.1% (60 of 239) of clinicians were unaware of PICC presence. Teaching attendings and hospitalists were more frequently unaware of the presence of CVCs than interns and residents (25.8% and 30.5%, respectively, vs. 16.4%). Critical care physicians were more likely to be aware of CVC presence than general medicine physicians (12.6% vs. 26.2%; P=0.003).
Limitations: Awareness was determined at 1 point in time and was not linked to outcomes. Patient length of stay and indication for CVC were not recorded.
Conclusion: Clinicians are frequently unaware of the presence of PICCs and triple-lumen catheters in hospitalized patients. Further study of mechanisms that ensure that clinicians are aware of these devices so that they may assess their necessity seems warranted.
Primary funding source: None.
Comment in
-
Whose line is it anyway?Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 21;161(8):607-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-2005. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25329208 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5. Intensive Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28584925
-
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in post-critical patients.Intensive Care Med. 2011 Feb;37(2):284-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2043-x. Epub 2010 Sep 21. Intensive Care Med. 2011. PMID: 20857280
-
Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring.J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Apr;26(2):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9337-1. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012. PMID: 22290064
-
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23917904 Review.
-
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16100130 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and implementation of a clinical decision support system-based quality initiative to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections.J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 23;8(1):e132. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.566. eCollection 2024. J Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 39345695 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of the multimodal intervention including an automatic notification of catheter days on reducing central line-related bloodstream infection: a retrospective, observational, quasi-experimental study.BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07588-9. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35804323 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ischaemic Stroke of the "Hand-Knob" Area Due to Paradoxical Cerebral Air Embolism after Central Venous Catheterization-A Doubly Rare Occurrence: A Case Report and an Overview of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):772. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060772. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35741657 Free PMC article.
-
Transition de l’héparine au sérum physiologique pour fermer les cathéters veineux centraux en oncologie: pratique fondée sur la recherche.Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):294-302. doi: 10.5737/23688076322294302. eCollection 2022 Spring. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022. PMID: 35582264 Free PMC article. French.
-
Transitioning from heparin to saline locks for central venous access devices in oncology: An evidence-based practice approach.Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):286-293. doi: 10.5737/23688076322286293. eCollection 2022 Spring. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2022. PMID: 35582245 Free PMC article.
References
-
- García-Rodríguez JF, Álvarez-Díaz H, Vilariño-Maneiro L, Lorenzo-García MV, Cantón-Blanco A, Ordoñez-Barrosa P, et al. Epidemiology and impact of a multifaceted approach in controlling central venous catheter associated blood stream infections outside the intensive care unit. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:445. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-445. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Evans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, Lloyd JF, Woller SC, Stevens SM, et al. Reduction of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated DVT. Chest. 2013;143:627–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources