Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 16 (3), 416-20

Ghost and Guest Authors: You Can't Always Trust Who You Read

Affiliations
Review

Ghost and Guest Authors: You Can't Always Trust Who You Read

Jerome Schofferman et al. Pain Med.

Abstract

Clinicians and educators rely on the published medical information. They trust that original research and narrative or systematic reviews are reliable and the authorship is transparent, but this is not always the case. Disclosure of conflicts of interest by authors is required by most journals, disclosure will not detect ghost or guest authorship. Ghosting or guesting is of more than academic interests because it can directly or indirectly affect patient care. Therefore it is important for readers to be aware of this issue, and to be alert to suggestions that particular works may be at increased risk for ghost or guest authors. It is important to take a proactive stance against these practices. Industry, universities, research centers, and professional medical associations should be clear and unequivocal in condeming these practices. Processes need to be in place to investigate and, if need be, deal with violations. Clearly, we must all participate in this endeavor for professional, ethical, and most importantly, best patient care reasons.

Comment in

  • Improving the Trustworthiness of Published Information.
    Hamilton CW, Marchington JM, Donnelly J, Gertel A. Hamilton CW, et al. Pain Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):1966-1967. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw028. Epub 2016 Mar 21. Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27002002 No abstract available.
  • Response to Letter by Hamilton et al.
    Schofferman J, Wetzel FT, Bono C. Schofferman J, et al. Pain Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):1968. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw171. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27550957 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

Feedback