Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 28;9(10):e104415.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104415. eCollection 2014.

The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance

Affiliations

The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance

Jaimie S Torrance et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Although many studies have investigated the facial characteristics that influence perceptions of others' attractiveness and dominance, the majority of these studies have focused on either the effects of shape information or surface information alone. Consequently, the relative contributions of facial shape and surface characteristics to attractiveness and dominance perceptions are unclear. To address this issue, we investigated the relationships between ratings of original versions of faces and ratings of versions in which either surface information had been standardized (i.e., shape-only versions) or shape information had been standardized (i.e., surface-only versions). For attractiveness and dominance judgments of both male and female faces, ratings of shape-only and surface-only versions independently predicted ratings of the original versions of faces. The correlations between ratings of original and shape-only versions and between ratings of original and surface-only versions differed only in two instances. For male attractiveness, ratings of original versions were more strongly related to ratings of surface-only than shape-only versions, suggesting that surface information is particularly important for men's facial attractiveness. The opposite was true for female physical dominance, suggesting that shape information is particularly important for women's facial physical dominance. In summary, our results indicate that both facial shape and surface information contribute to judgments of others' attractiveness and dominance, suggesting that it may be important to consider both sources of information in research on these topics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of original (left), shape-only (centre), and surface-only (right) versions of female (top row) and male (bottom row) faces used in the study.
Shape-only versions were manufactured by warping a prototype with the average color and texture information for the sample into the shape of each individual face. Surface-only versions were manufactured by warping each individual face into the average shape for the entire sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, et al... (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. - PubMed
    1. Rhodes G (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. - PubMed
    1. Puts DA (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.
    1. Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354. - PubMed
    1. Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2012). Face structure predicts cooperation: Men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient. Psychological Science, 23, 718–722. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/I031022/1, which was awarded to LMD and BCJ, and European Research Council Starting Grant 282655 (OCMATE), which was awarded to BCJ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources