The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance
- PMID: 25349994
- PMCID: PMC4211661
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104415
The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance
Abstract
Although many studies have investigated the facial characteristics that influence perceptions of others' attractiveness and dominance, the majority of these studies have focused on either the effects of shape information or surface information alone. Consequently, the relative contributions of facial shape and surface characteristics to attractiveness and dominance perceptions are unclear. To address this issue, we investigated the relationships between ratings of original versions of faces and ratings of versions in which either surface information had been standardized (i.e., shape-only versions) or shape information had been standardized (i.e., surface-only versions). For attractiveness and dominance judgments of both male and female faces, ratings of shape-only and surface-only versions independently predicted ratings of the original versions of faces. The correlations between ratings of original and shape-only versions and between ratings of original and surface-only versions differed only in two instances. For male attractiveness, ratings of original versions were more strongly related to ratings of surface-only than shape-only versions, suggesting that surface information is particularly important for men's facial attractiveness. The opposite was true for female physical dominance, suggesting that shape information is particularly important for women's facial physical dominance. In summary, our results indicate that both facial shape and surface information contribute to judgments of others' attractiveness and dominance, suggesting that it may be important to consider both sources of information in research on these topics.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.Evol Psychol. 2014 Mar 27;12(1):251-63. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200118. Evol Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25299763 Free PMC article.
-
When facial attractiveness is only skin deep.Perception. 2004;33(5):569-76. doi: 10.1068/p3463. Perception. 2004. PMID: 15250662
-
Men's judgments of women's facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar.J Vis. 2012 Nov 6;12(12):3. doi: 10.1167/12.12.3. J Vis. 2012. PMID: 23132932
-
The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.J Evol Biol. 2016 Nov;29(11):2311-2320. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12958. Epub 2016 Aug 22. J Evol Biol. 2016. PMID: 27488414
-
Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Nov-Dec;23(6):805-14. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21219. Epub 2011 Sep 28. Am J Hum Biol. 2011. PMID: 21957062
Cited by
-
Effects of facial skin pigmentation on social judgments in a Mexican population.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0279858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279858. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38032952 Free PMC article.
-
The importance of face-shape masculinity for perceptions of male dominance depends on study design.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39912-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37537340 Free PMC article.
-
Judgements of Social Dominance From Faces and Related Variables.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:873147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873147. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35578657 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Colour matters more than shape for chimpanzees' recognition of developmental face changes.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 23;10(1):18201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75284-2. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33097811 Free PMC article.
-
Cranial Neural Crest Cells and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Craniofacial Anomalies and Coronal Craniosynostosis.J Dev Biol. 2020 Sep 9;8(3):18. doi: 10.3390/jdb8030018. J Dev Biol. 2020. PMID: 32916911 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, et al... (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. - PubMed
-
- Rhodes G (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. - PubMed
-
- Puts DA (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.
-
- Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354. - PubMed
-
- Stirrat M, Perrett DI (2012). Face structure predicts cooperation: Men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient. Psychological Science, 23, 718–722. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
