Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals
- PMID: 25357045
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000505
Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the frequency of various reconstructive techniques for autologous breast reconstruction and (2) to compare perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.
Materials: The authors analyzed clinical data of patients who underwent autologous breast reconstructive surgery from 2009 to 2010 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Autologous breast reconstruction operations included latissimus dorsi myocutaneous, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP), free superficial inferior epigastric artery, and free gluteal artery perforator flaps.
Results: A total of 35,883 patients underwent autologous breast reconstructive surgery in that period. Most reconstructions were performed in teaching hospitals (74 percent). The two most common breast reconstruction types in teaching hospitals were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (26 percent) and DIEP flaps (26 percent), compared with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (39 percent) and pedicled TRAM flaps (22 percent) in nonteaching hospitals. In addition, the rate of free flap breast reconstruction was significantly higher in teaching hospitals (46 percent) compared with nonteaching hospitals (31 percent) (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference for total in-hospital complication rate (teaching, 6.9 percent; nonteaching, 7.1 percent; p = 0.54) or total in-hospital mortality rate (teaching, 0.04 percent; nonteaching, 0.05 percent; p = 0.56).
Conclusions: Three-fourths of autologous breast reconstructions performed from 2009 to 2010 were performed in teaching hospitals, with free flaps also more likely to be performed in teaching hospitals. Despite more complex free flap breast reconstructions being performed in teaching hospitals, there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative outcomes (morbidity and mortality) between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.
Similar articles
-
Autologous Breast Reconstruction Trends in the United States: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Sep 1;87(3):242-247. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002664. Ann Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33443887
-
The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients.Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Breast. 2013. PMID: 23769660
-
Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d6b. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964681
-
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 25536199 Review.
-
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29369109 Review.
Cited by
-
Scalp Reconstruction Using the Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap: A 12-Year Experience.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 19;12(8):2953. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082953. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37109289 Free PMC article.
-
Differences and their contexts between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in Iran with other countries: A concurrent mixed-methods study.J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jan 31;11:32. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1431_20. eCollection 2022. J Educ Health Promot. 2022. PMID: 35281395 Free PMC article.
-
Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1280-1290. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006225. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31764633 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C. Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J. 2013;19:463–469
-
- Gart MS, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ, et al. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:229–238
-
- Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Agarwal J. An analysis of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction frequency using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast J. 2011;17:352–358
-
- Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23
-
- Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Hishon L, et al. A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:192e–200e
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
