Increasing preventive health services via tailored health communications
- PMID: 25365686
Increasing preventive health services via tailored health communications
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a methodology that stratifies members by likelihood of completing a colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). Such information can guide the communication development and the allocation of resources for tailored communication outreaches.
Study design: Prospective study of an insured commercial population that includes randomized assignments to a control group or a treatment group for communication interventions.
Methods: A total of 46,697 members overdue (nonadherent based on available administrative data) for a CRCS were assigned to 1 of 5 graded segments as part of an interactive voice response (IVR) call. Another 400 members per outreach segment were randomly assigned to a control group and received no communication. Primary outcome: receipt of CRCS (assessed Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set [HEDIS] summary data, 3 months after IVR) for each graded segment within the control and the intervention groups. Secondary outcomes: association between the CRCS rates and the identified segments; communication cost per completed screening.
Results: Primary outcome: 1971 members completed the screening. Screening rates for the 5 graded segments were 2.4%, 3.6%, 5.0%, 7.2%, and 8.0%. Secondary outcome: c2 proportions test a significant association between the segment groups and the CRCS completion rates. The association between segment and screening rates follow the expected predicted range in both the intervention and holdout groups. Communication cost per screening: $14.84.
Conclusions: Segmenting members by variables that are associated with CRCS completion identified graded segments that completed the CRCSs at different rates. Tailored interventions can be developed to promote a health service for each segment. The segmentation approach proves to be beneficial.
Similar articles
-
Use of interactive voice response to improve colorectal cancer screening.Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):496-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000116. Med Care. 2014. PMID: 24638119 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2352. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24934845 Clinical Trial.
-
Toward a trustworthy voice: increasing the effectiveness of automated outreach calls to promote colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.Perm J. 2014 Spring;18(2):33-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-139. Perm J. 2014. PMID: 24867548 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-based disparities in colorectal cancer screening.Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;37(6):555-60. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318282a830. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23466582
-
Strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening.Nurse Pract. 2012 Jul 10;37(7):21-6; quiz 26-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000415240.16601.d1. Nurse Pract. 2012. PMID: 22653430
Cited by
-
Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 14;12(12):CD009921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009921.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27960229 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous