Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;24(11):3668-3677.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3415-5. Epub 2014 Nov 9.

Isolated Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Reproduces Natural Patellofemoral Joint Kinematics When the Patella Is Resurfaced


Isolated Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Reproduces Natural Patellofemoral Joint Kinematics When the Patella Is Resurfaced

Hilde Vandenneucker et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. .


Purpose: The objectives of this in vitro project were to compare the dynamic three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics, contact forces, contact areas and contact pressures of a contemporary patellofemoral prosthetic implant with those of the native knee and to measure the influence of patellar resurfacing and patellar thickness. The hypothesis was that these designs are capable to reproduce the natural kinematics but result in higher contact pressures.

Methods: Six fresh-frozen specimens were tested on a custom-made mechanical knee rig before and after prosthetic trochlear resurfacing, without and with patellar resurfacing in three different patellar thicknesses. Full three-dimensional kinematics were analysed during three different motor tasks, using infrared motion capture cameras and retroflective markers. Patellar contact characteristics were registered using a pressure measuring device.

Results: The patellofemoral kinematic behaviour of the patellofemoral arthroplasty was similar to that of the normal knee when the patella was resurfaced, showing only significant (p < 0.0001) changes in patellar flexion. Without patellar resurfacing, significant more patellar flexion, lateral tilt and lateral rotation was noticed. Compared to the normal knee, contact pressures were significantly elevated after isolated trochlear resurfacing. However, the values were more than doubled after patellar resurfacing. Changes in patellar thickness only influenced the antero-posterior patellar position. There was no other influence on the kinematics, and only a limited influence on the contact pressures in the low flexion angles.

Conclusion: The investigated design reproduced the normal patellofemoral kinematics acceptable well when the patella was resurfaced. From a kinematic point of view, patellar resurfacing may be advisable. However, the substantially elevated patellar contact pressures remain a point of concern in the decision whether or not to resurface the patella. This study therefore not only adds a new point in the discussion whether or not to resurface the patella, but also supports the claimed advantage that a patellofemoral arthroplasty is capable to reproduce the natural knee kinematics.

Keywords: Contact pressure; Kinematics; Patellar resurfacing; Patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles


    1. Knee. 2009 Oct;16(5):358-65 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88 Suppl 4:122-37 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:85-93 - PubMed
    1. Knee. 2002 Feb;9(1):27-30 - PubMed
    1. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008 Jul;39(3):347-54, vi - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources