Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 13;20:2275-82.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.891102.

Microstructural Abnormality in Left Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Dysfunctional Beliefs in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Microstructural Abnormality in Left Nucleus Accumbens Predicts Dysfunctional Beliefs in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Zhongchun Li et al. Med Sci Monit. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether dysfunctional beliefs might predict treatment-resistance and to examine the relationship between fractional anisotropy (FA) in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and cognitive biases for optimal treatment choice.

Material/methods: We recruited 11 non-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients, 11 resistant OCD patients, and 11 healthy subjects.

Results: OCD patients had higher Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ-87) subscale scores than subjects in non-resistant and resistant groups. A significant difference was found between non-resistant and resistant OCD patients in R-Scale and I-Scale. A significant decrease in FA was found in left dorsal frontal gyrus and left inferior parietal lobule in the non-resistant group as compared to the control group. FA also decreased significantly in left anterior cingulate cortex, putamen, and nucleus accumbens in the resistant group as compared to the control group. There was a significant decrease in FA in nucleus accumbens in the resistant group as compared to the non-resistant group. Reduced FA in left nucleus accumbens was negatively associated with OBQ-87 factor R and I and the total Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).

Conclusions: Abnormalities in cortical-striatal white matter networks may contribute to the dysfunctional beliefs in patients with treatment-resistant OCD, and the left nucleus accumbens may be an important and promising target for the treatment of OCD.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OBQ-87 factors in three groups. Student t test, ** P<0.01, vs. resistant and non-resistant OCD patients; # P<0.05, ## P<0.01, vs. non-resistant OCD patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regions with decreased FA (left dorsal frontal gyrus and left Inferior parietal lobule) in non-resistant OCD patients when compared with healthy controls (A) and in treatment-resistant OCD patients (left anterior cingulate, left putamen and left nucleus accumbens) when compared with healthy controls (B). Regions with marked difference in FA (left nucleus accumbens) between non-resistant OCD group and resistant OCD group (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Significantly negative correlation of reduced FA of left nucleus accumbens with factor R and I in OBQ-87 and total YBOCS score. FA, fractional anisotropy; OBQ-87, Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire; YBOCS, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 4 articles

References

    1. de Koning PP, Figee M, van den Munckhof P, et al. Current status of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a clinical review of different targets. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011;13:274–82. - PubMed
    1. De Berardis D, Serroni N, Marini S, et al. Agomelatine augmentation of escitalopram therapy in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case report. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2012;2012:642752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert U, Barbaro F, Aguglia A, et al. [Combined treatments in obsessive-compulsive disorder: current knowledge and future prospects]. Riv Psichiatr. 2012;47:255–68. - PubMed
    1. Riestra AR, Aguilar J, Zambito G, et al. Unilateral right anterior capsulotomy for refractory major depression with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neurocase. 2011;17:491–500. - PubMed
    1. Lipsman N, Giacobbe P, Bernstein M, Lozano AM. Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:107–11. - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback