Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients
- PMID: 25411817
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2926
Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients
Abstract
Importance: Patients with cochlear implants (CIs) should be fully informed before undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) about the possibility of discomfort or pain. Prior to an MRI scan, patients need to fully understand not only the potential complications but also the potential discomfort that they may experience during the scan.
Objective: To assess the adverse events during MRI in patients with CIs and to investigate the safety and diagnostic efficiency of MRI in patients with CIs with internal magnets.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective review of the medical records of 18 patients with CIs undergoing MRI between September 2003 and February 2014 at a single tertiary referral center.
Interventions: Sixteen patients underwent MRI in a 1.5-T scanner, and 2 patients underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner. Twelve brain MRI scans were performed, and 18 MRI scans were performed in areas outside the brain.
Main outcomes and measures: Discomfort or pain, adverse events, and auditory performance after MRI were evaluated using medical records or interviews.
Results: Thirteen of 18 patients completed their MRI scans (25 of 30 scans). Five patients with head bandages were unable to complete their MRI scans owing to pain; one of these patients experienced magnet displacement, and another underwent surgery for magnet removal and reinsertion. Finally, 1 patient experienced polarity reversal of the magnet. Artifacts induced by the CI internal magnet compromised the diagnosis of ipsilateral brain lesions under 1.5-T MRI. Auditory performance in the CI recipients who had major events was unaffected.
Conclusions and relevance: Even with protective head bandages, 1.5-T MRI in patients with CIs led to a variety of adverse events, including discomfort or pain and displacement of the internal magnet. Therefore, sedation and careful head positioning may be appropriate for some patients with CIs who undergo MRI, and these patients should be carefully monitored to decrease the likelihood of such adverse effects.
Comment in
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients: pros and cons.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jan;141(1):52-3. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2932. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 25412437 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):965-71. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000666. Otol Neurotol. 2015. PMID: 25931165
-
Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: Are we truly practicing MRI safety?Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):482-489. doi: 10.1002/lary.27516. Epub 2018 Nov 9. Laryngoscope. 2019. PMID: 30412276
-
Revision surgery due to magnet dislocation in cochlear implant patients: an emerging complication.Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a5d2c5. Otol Neurotol. 2014. PMID: 24270727
-
First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):883-891. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002269. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31219967 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1321-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000230479.39551.4a. Laryngoscope. 2006. PMID: 16885731 Review.
Cited by
-
Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep 16;91(1):101512. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101512. Online ahead of print. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39442262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1231-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08224-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37707616 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Active Implantable Hearing Devices: Reports from the Daily Radiological Routine in an Outpatient MR Center.J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 31;13(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081220. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37623470 Free PMC article.
-
MRI surveillance after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation: is it feasible?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5259-5265. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08036-3. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 37266754 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implants: What the Neurosurgeon Needs to Know.Cureus. 2022 Oct 6;14(10):e29998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29998. eCollection 2022 Oct. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36381735 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
