Magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients: pros and cons
- PMID: 25412437
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2932
Magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients: pros and cons
Comment on
-
Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jan;141(1):45-52. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2926. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 25411817
Similar articles
-
A Rare Complication of Cochlear Implantation After Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reversion of the Magnet.J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4):e372-e374. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003724. J Craniofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28328611
-
Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1215-20. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1d61. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 20729783
-
Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.Am J Otol. 1998 Sep;19(5):584-90. Am J Otol. 1998. PMID: 9752965
-
[Preoperative imaging of the inner ear prior to the implantation of a multichannel cochlear implant using computed and MR technology].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000 Jun 2;112(11):481-6. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000. PMID: 10890125 Review. German.
-
Pediatric and adult cochlear implantation.Radiographics. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):1185-200. doi: 10.1148/rg.235025046. Radiographics. 2003. PMID: 12975509 Review.
Cited by
-
Stability of the standard incus coupling of the Carina middle ear actuator after 1.5T MRI.PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231213. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32271819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
