Effect of uterine rupture on a hospital's future rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
- PMID: 25415169
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000545
Effect of uterine rupture on a hospital's future rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
Abstract
Objective: To identify whether a hospital's vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate, trial of labor after cesarean delivery rate, or trial of labor success rate decrease after the occurrence of a uterine rupture.
Methods: The study population was drawn from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a sample of U.S. hospitals, between 1998 and 2010. We extracted deliveries to women with a previous cesarean delivery. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify severe uterine ruptures and rates of vaginal birth, trial of labor, and trial of labor success. We used the difference-in-differences design and compared the rates of the outcomes before and after a rupture across hospitals using hospitals without ruptures to control for secular trends. Included in the analysis were 1,202,284 delivery records from 7,975 hospital-years without ruptures and 211,850 records from 510 hospital-years with uterine ruptures.
Results: Before the occurrence of a severe uterine rupture, there were an estimated 60 successful vaginal deliveries for every 100 women with a previous cesarean delivery who entered labor. In the month after the rupture, the trial of labor success rate decreased by an estimated 25 cases per 1,000 labors (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-44/1,000, P=.01) before returning to baseline. The percentage of women with a previous cesarean delivery who attempted vaginal delivery did not significantly change after the rupture. Overall, there were 17 more cesarean deliveries per 1,000 women with a previous cesarean delivery (95% CI 4-31/1,000, P=.01) in the month after the uterine rupture.
Conclusion: The decrease in the trial of labor success rate after a recent uterine rupture is likely the result of short-term changes in risk evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):336-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.125. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30465748
-
The Feasibility of a Trial of Labor after Two Cesarean Deliveries: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Success.Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2636-e2644. doi: 10.1055/a-2135-6962. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Am J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 37487547
-
Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):98.e1-98.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Sep 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30278176
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
-
Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S783-S803. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.030. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38462257 Review.
Cited by
-
'Immunising' physicians against availability bias in diagnostic reasoning: a randomised controlled experiment.BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):550-559. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010079. Epub 2020 Jan 27. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020. PMID: 31988257 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating the impact of health policies: using a difference-in-differences approach.Int J Public Health. 2019 May;64(4):637-642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1195-2. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Int J Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30607473 No abstract available.
-
Utilizing Datasets to Advance Perinatal Research.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Sep;62(5):545-561. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12640. Epub 2017 Aug 11. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017. PMID: 28799702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.738. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Value Health. 2017. PMID: 28212958 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(11):2318-2327. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2055-4. Matern Child Health J. 2016. PMID: 27473092
References
-
- Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labour among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8.
-
- Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329:19–25.
-
- Macones GA, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo A, Peipert J, Stevens EJ. Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1148–52.
-
- Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 2003;78:775–80.
-
- Kuklina EV, Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, et al.. An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity. Matern Child Health J 2008;12:469–77.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
