Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jan;48(1):98-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

State Medicaid expansion decisions and disparities in women's cancer screening

Affiliations
Comparative Study

State Medicaid expansion decisions and disparities in women's cancer screening

Lindsay M Sabik et al. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Background: There are substantial disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening that stem from lack of health insurance. Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expands insurance coverage to many Americans, there are differences in availability of Medicaid coverage across states.

Purpose: To understand the potential impact of Medicaid expansions on disparities in preventive care for low-income women by assessing pre-ACA breast and cervical cancer screening across states currently expanding and not expanding Medicaid to low-income adults.

Methods: Data from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (analyzed in 2014) were used to consider differences in demographics among women for whom screening is recommended, including income and race/ethnicity, across expansion and nonexpansion states. Self-reported screening was compared by state expansion status overall, for the uninsured, and for low-income women. Logistic regressions were estimated to assess differences in self-reported screening across expansion and nonexpansion states controlling for demographics.

Results: Women in states that are not expanding Medicaid had significantly lower odds of receiving recommended mammograms (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95) or Pap tests (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95). The difference was larger among the uninsured (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56, 0.91 for mammography; OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.65, 0.94 for Pap tests).

Conclusions: As women in nonexpansion states remain uninsured and others gain coverage, existing disparities in cancer screening by race and socioeconomic status are likely to widen. Health risks and associated costs to underserved populations must be taken into account in ongoing debates over expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unadjusted screening rates by state Medicaid expansion status, insurance, and income

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L. Mammography screening in African American women: evaulating the research. Cancer. 2003;97(S1):258–72. - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez MA, Ward LM, Pérez-Stable EJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):235–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selvin E, Brett KM. Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):618–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi L, Lebrun LA, Zhu J, Tsai J. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011;Cancer screening among racial/ethnic and insurance groups in the United States: a comparison of disparities in 2000 and 2008.22(3):945–61. - PubMed
    1. Busch SH, Duchovny N. Family coverage expansions: impact on insurance coverage and health care utilization of parents. J Health Econ. 2005;24(5):876–90. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms