Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 16;111(50):17786-90.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414058111. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Effects of Biological Explanations for Mental Disorders on Clinicians' Empathy

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Effects of Biological Explanations for Mental Disorders on Clinicians' Empathy

Matthew S Lebowitz et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Mental disorders are increasingly understood in terms of biological mechanisms. We examined how such biological explanations of patients' symptoms would affect mental health clinicians' empathy--a crucial component of the relationship between treatment-providers and patients--as well as their clinical judgments and recommendations. In a series of studies, US clinicians read descriptions of potential patients whose symptoms were explained using either biological or psychosocial information. Biological explanations have been thought to make patients appear less accountable for their disorders, which could increase clinicians' empathy. To the contrary, biological explanations evoked significantly less empathy. These results are consistent with other research and theory that has suggested that biological accounts of psychopathology can exacerbate perceptions of patients as abnormal, distinct from the rest of the population, meriting social exclusion, and even less than fully human. Although the ongoing shift toward biomedical conceptualizations has many benefits, our results reveal unintended negative consequences.

Keywords: biological explanations; dehumanization; empathy; essentialism; mental disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean empathy scores, by disorder, in studies 1 (schizophrenia and social phobia) and 2 (depression and OCD). Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher numbers indicating more empathy. Error bars represent 1 SEMpairedDiff (36).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mean clinical utility scores, by disorder, in studies 1 (schizophrenia and social phobia) and 2 (depression and OCD). Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher numbers corresponding to greater perceived clinical utility. Error bars represent 1 SEMpairedDiff (36).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 23 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback