Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 25471910
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187
Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of brace application for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures with regard to whether the patients had no braces, rigid braces, or soft braces.
Methods: We randomly assigned sixty patients with acute one-level osteoporotic compression fractures within three days of injury to the no-brace, soft-brace, and rigid-brace groups through 1:1:1 allocation. The primary outcome was the baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture. The non-inferior margin of the Oswestry Disability Index was set at an average of 10 points.
Results: The baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture in the no-brace group was not inferior to that in the soft-brace or rigid-brace groups. The mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 37.83 points (95% confidence interval, 26.77 to 48.90 points) in the soft-brace group, with a difference of -1.88 points (95% confidence interval, -7.02 to 9.38 points) between the groups. Similarly, the mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 33.54 points (95% confidence interval, 23.79 to 43.29 points) in the rigid-brace group, with a difference of 2.41 points (95% confidence interval, -7.86 to 9.27 points) between the groups. During the follow-up assessment period, there was no significant difference among the groups for the overall Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.260), visual analog scale for pain scores for back pain (p = 0.292), and anterior body compression ratios (p = 0.237). However, the Oswestry Disability Index scores and the visual analog scale scores for back pain significantly improved with time after the fractures (p < 0.001), and the body compression ratios significantly decreased with time in all three groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The Oswestry Disability Index scores for the treatment of compression fractures without a brace were not inferior to those with soft or rigid braces. Moreover, the improvement in back pain and progression of anterior body compression were similar among the three groups.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02049931.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic corset versus three-point brace in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective, comparative study.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0602-x. Epub 2016 Jul 8. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017. PMID: 27386868
-
Nonoperative treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective randomized study of different treatment options.J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Sep;23(8):588-94. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a18728. J Orthop Trauma. 2009. PMID: 19704275 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs): conservative treatment versus balloon kyphoplasty.Spine J. 2012 Nov;12(11):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 29. Spine J. 2012. PMID: 23026068 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Conservative Therapy for Treating Osteoporotic Compression Fractures in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 15;98(12):1041-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00425. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. PMID: 27307365 Review.
-
Bracing for thoracolumbar fractures.Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS1477. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. PMID: 24981902 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of thoracolumbar spinal orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures.J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):501-513. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-14. Epub 2024 Sep 19. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39399089 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of thoracolumbar injury classification and Severity Score in the management of acute and subacute Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures - A pilot study and a suggested modification.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Sep 10;3(3):100438. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100438. eCollection 2024 Sep. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39309034 Free PMC article.
-
Conservative Treatments in the Management of Acute Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432041. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32041. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39240564 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of spinal orthoses on osteoporotic elderly patients kyphosis, back muscles strength, balance and osteoporotic vertebral fractures: (A systematic review and meta-analysis).J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024 Aug 25;11:20556683241268605. doi: 10.1177/20556683241268605. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024. PMID: 39211735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multiple Vertebral Compression Fractures Secondary to Pregnancy-induced Osteoporosis: A Case Report.J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Jun;14(6):101-107. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i06.4518. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38910989 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
