Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
- PMID: 25482066
- PMCID: PMC4615760
- DOI: 10.4161/19491034.2014.979712
Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
Abstract
Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape.
Keywords: 3D-CLSM, 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy; 3D-SIM, 3-dimensional structured illumination microscopy; B23, nucleophosmin B23; BTA, Bos taurus; CDC, chromatin domain cluster; CT, chromosome territory; EM, electron microscopy; ENC, embryonic nuclei with conventional nuclear architecture; ENP, embryonic nuclei with peripheral CT distribution; H3K4me3; H3K4me3, histone H3 with tri-methylated lysine 4; H3K9me3; H3K9me3, histone H3 with tri-methylated lysine 9; H3S10p, histone H3 with phosphorylated serine 10; IC, interchromatin compartment; IVF, in vitro fertilization; MCB, major chromatin body; PR, perichromatin region; RNA polymerase II; RNA polymerase II-S2p, RNA polymerase II with phosphorylated serine 2 of its CTD domain; RNA polymerase II-S5p, RNA polymerase II with phosphorylated serine 5 of its CTD domain; SC-35, splicing factor SC-35; SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer.; bovine preimplantation development; chromatin domain; chromosome territory; embryonic genome activation; in vitro fertilization (IVF); interchromatin compartment; major EGA, major embryonic genome activation; somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Positional changes of a pluripotency marker gene during structural reorganization of fibroblast nuclei in cloned early bovine embryos.Nucleus. 2014;5(6):542-54. doi: 10.4161/19491034.2014.970107. Nucleus. 2014. PMID: 25495180 Free PMC article.
-
Nuclear profiles of H3 histones trimethylated on Lys27 in bovine (Bos taurus) embryos obtained after in vitro fertilization or somatic cell nuclear transfer.J Reprod Dev. 2010 Aug;56(4):379-88. doi: 10.1262/jrd.09-182a. Epub 2010 Apr 22. J Reprod Dev. 2010. PMID: 20431250
-
H3K9 demethylase KDM4E is an epigenetic regulator for bovine embryonic development and a defective factor for nuclear reprogramming.Development. 2018 Feb 16;145(4):dev158261. doi: 10.1242/dev.158261. Development. 2018. PMID: 29453221
-
H3.3 replacement facilitates epigenetic reprogramming of donor nuclei in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.Nucleus. 2014 Sep-Oct;5(5):369-75. doi: 10.4161/nucl.36231. Nucleus. 2014. PMID: 25482190 Review.
-
Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture.Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2000;10(2):179-212. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2000. PMID: 11186332 Review.
Cited by
-
Remodeling of nuclear landscapes during human myelopoietic cell differentiation maintains co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments.Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015 Nov 17;8:47. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0038-0. eCollection 2015. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015. PMID: 26579212 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional analysis of nuclear heterochromatin distribution during early development in the rabbit.Chromosoma. 2018 Sep;127(3):387-403. doi: 10.1007/s00412-018-0671-z. Epub 2018 Apr 18. Chromosoma. 2018. PMID: 29666907 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy of the inactive X chromosome territory reveals a collapse of its active nuclear compartment harboring distinct Xist RNA foci.Epigenetics Chromatin. 2014 Apr 28;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-8. eCollection 2014. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2014. PMID: 25057298 Free PMC article.
-
A transient ischemic environment induces reversible compaction of chromatin.Genome Biol. 2015 Nov 5;16:246. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0802-2. Genome Biol. 2015. PMID: 26541514 Free PMC article.
-
Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 28;22(1):236. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010236. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33379395 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1985; 82:8527-9; PMID:3866238; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 2013; 152:1270-84; PMID:23498936; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cardoso MC, Schneider K, Martin RM, Leonhardt H. Structure, function and dynamics of nuclear subcompartments. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012; 24:79-85; PMID:22227228; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cavalli G, Misteli T. Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013; 20:290-9; PMID:23463314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2474 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- de Graaf CA, van Steensel B. Chromatin organization: form to function. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23:185-90; PMID:23274160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.011 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials