Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance
- PMID: 25495091
- DOI: 10.1037/apl0000006
Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance
Abstract
Grounded in a social functional perspective, this article examines the conditions under which group affect influences group functioning. Using meta-analysis, the authors leverage heterogeneity across 39 independent studies of 2,799 groups to understand how contextual factors-group affect source (exogenous or endogenous to the group) and group life span (one-shot or ongoing)-moderate the influence of shared feelings on social integration and task performance. As predicted, results indicate that group positive affect has consistent positive effects on social integration and task performance regardless of contextual idiosyncrasies. The effects of group negative affect, on the other hand, are context-dependent. Shared negative feelings promote social integration and task performance when stemming from an exogenous source or experienced in a 1-shot group, but undermine social integration and task performance when stemming from an endogenous source or experienced in an ongoing group. The authors discuss implications of their findings and highlight directions for future theory and research on group affect.
(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
When sad groups expect to meet again: interactive affective sharing and future interaction expectation as determinants of work groups' analytical and creative task performance.Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):667-85. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12000. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Br J Soc Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23046393
-
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. Pediatrics. 2003. PMID: 12777595
-
To branch out or stay focused? Affective shifts differentially predict organizational citizenship behavior and task performance.J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jun;101(6):831-45. doi: 10.1037/apl0000088. Epub 2016 Feb 15. J Appl Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26882443
-
The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms.Ergonomics. 2000 Aug;43(8):1129-52. doi: 10.1080/00140130050084914. Ergonomics. 2000. PMID: 10975177 Review.
-
Contextual and social influences on valuation and choice.Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:215-37. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00013-7. Prog Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23317835 Review.
Cited by
-
Demographic factors, partial social belonging and psychological resources associated with coping.Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1154659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154659. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37077847 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Positive and Negative Experiences on Cooperative Behavior: The Role of Sharedness.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010636. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36612957 Free PMC article.
-
Partial Social Integration as a Predictor of COVID-19 Vaccine Rejection and Distress Indicators.Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;10:900070. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900070. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35958848 Free PMC article.
-
Embodied Interaffectivity in the Emergence and Maintenance of Group Cohesion.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:822072. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822072. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35846658 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Ambidextrous Leadership on Employees' Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment.Front Psychol. 2022 May 16;13:862799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862799. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35651581 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
