Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 349, g7094

The Darwin Awards: Sex Differences in Idiotic Behaviour

Affiliations

The Darwin Awards: Sex Differences in Idiotic Behaviour

Ben Alexander Daniel Lendrem et al. BMJ.

Abstract

Sex differences in risk seeking behaviour, emergency hospital admissions, and mortality are well documented. However, little is known about sex differences in idiotic risk taking behaviour. This paper reviews the data on winners of the Darwin Award over a 20 year period (1995-2014). Winners of the Darwin Award must eliminate themselves from the gene pool in such an idiotic manner that their action ensures one less idiot will survive. This paper reports a marked sex difference in Darwin Award winners: males are significantly more likely to receive the award than females (P<0.0001). We discuss some of the reasons for this difference.

Conflict of interest statement

Contributors: BADL conceived the study, designed the data collection tools, and cleaned and analysed the data. All authors were involved in interpreting the results and drafting and revising the paper.

Figures

None
Male and female Darwin Award winners. Line H0 indicates expected percentages under the null hypothesis that males and females are equally idiotic

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol 2004;8:291.
    1. Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P. Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review. J Adv Nurs 2005;49:616-23. - PubMed
    1. Fehr-Duda H, De Gennaro M, Schubert R. Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theor Decis 2006;60:283-313.
    1. Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak 2006;1(1): p. 48-63.
    1. Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of experimental economics results. Vol 1. North-Holland, 2008:1061-73.

Publication types

Feedback