Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec 15:12:124.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-124.

Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring

Affiliations
Review

Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring

Peter Kovacs. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

In vitro fertilization has been available for over 3 decades. Its use is becoming more widespread worldwide, and in the developed world, up to 5% of children have been born following IVF. It is estimated that over 5 million children have been conceived in vitro. In addition to giving hope to infertile couples to have their own family, in vitro fertilization has also introduced risks as well. The risk of multiple gestation and the associated maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality has increased significantly over the past few decades. While stricter transfer policies have eliminated the majority of the high-order multiples, these changes have not yet had much of an impact on the incidence of twins. A twin pregnancy can be avoided by the transfer of a single embryo only. However, the traditionally used method of morphologic embryo selection is not predictive enough to allow routine single embryo transfer; therefore, new screening tools are needed. Time-lapse embryo monitoring allows continuous, non-invasive embryo observation without the need to remove the embryo from optimal culturing conditions. The extra information on the cleavage pattern, morphologic changes and embryo development dynamics could help us identify embryos with a higher implantation potential. These technologic improvements enable us to objectively select the embryo(s) for transfer based on certain algorithms. In the past 5-6 years, numerous studies have been published that confirmed the safety of time-lapse technology. In addition, various markers have already been identified that are associated with the minimal likelihood of implantation and others that are predictive of blastocyst development, implantation potential, genetic health and pregnancy. Various groups have proposed different algorithms for embryo selection based on mostly retrospective data analysis. However, large prospective trials are needed to study the full benefit of these (and potentially new) algorithms before their introduction into daily practice can be recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Embryo development from 2PN to blastocyst stage and the various terminology used in the different papers for certain developmental events.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steptoe PCV, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92957-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishara O, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2005. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:366–378. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Kupka M, Bhattacharya S, de Mouzon J, Castilla JA, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A, European IVF-monitoring (EIM); Consortium for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2318–2331. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det278. - DOI - PubMed
    1. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
    1. Kovacs P. Multiple pregnancies after ART and how to minimize their occurrence. Current Women’s Health Reviews. 2012;8(4):289–296. doi: 10.2174/1573404811208040003. - DOI