The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence
- PMID: 25519143
- DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu063
The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence
Abstract
Background: Cryopreservation has been extensively used in assisted reproductive technology, agriculture and conservation programmes for endangered species. The literature reports largely positive results regarding the survival of frozen-thawed cells and clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether or not cryopreservation of sperm, oocytes and embryos causes any disruption in their genetic integrity. Drawing on the available published evidence, this review paper describes in detail the physical and biochemical factors of cryopreservation that could potentially affect genomic integrity.
Methods: A critical review of the published literature using PubMed with particular emphasis on studies which include assessment of genetic stability after cryopreservation of oocyte, sperm and embryos. The search was performed in 2014 and covered the period from the beginning of electronic records until July 2014. No language restrictions were applied.
Results: Cryopreservation is associated with extensive damage to cell membranes, and results in alteration of the functional and metabolic status of the cells and mitochondria. Some evidence suggests an increase in DNA single-strand breaks, and degree of DNA condensation or fragmentation in sperm after cryopreservation. The extent of these changes may vary between different individuals and different techniques. The addition of antioxidants to the cryopreservation media and the use of well-controlled cooling regimes could potentially improve such outcomes. Limited numbers of studies on oocytes provide controversial results regarding the effect on DNA fragmentation, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and aneuploidy. The only study on human embryos suggested that vitrification affects DNA integrity to a much lesser extent than slow freezing. Animal studies show increases in mitochondrial DNA mutations in embryos after cryopreservation. The limited numbers of long-term follow-up studies in humans provide reassurance that derives mostly from retrospective studies with some methodological weaknesses.
Conclusions: This review provides an overview of studies performed to date on the effect of cryopreservation on the oocyte, sperm and embryos. Controversy of the reported data has highlighted the gaps in our knowledge not only for clinical studies, but also for basic research in human embryos. New perspectives for future research are proposed.
Keywords: cryopreservation; embryos; genome; oocytes; sperm.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill). 2001 Jul;5(3):211-3. Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill). 2001. PMID: 11753534
-
A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos.Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):536-54. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Hum Reprod Update. 2012. PMID: 22537859 Review.
-
Cryopreservation of animal oocytes and embryos: Current progress and future prospects.Theriogenology. 2016 Oct 15;86(7):1637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Theriogenology. 2016. PMID: 27555525 Review.
-
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data.Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2158-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep125. Epub 2009 May 20. Hum Reprod. 2009. PMID: 19458318 Review.
-
Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 5;113 Suppl 1:S24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.006. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. PMID: 15041126 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of microRNA in Spermatogenesis: Is There a Place for Fertility Preservation Innovation?Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 29;25(1):460. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010460. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38203631 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sperm DNA Fragmentation after Cryopreservation and Sperm Selection Has No Implications for Clinical Pregnancies and Live Births after Intrauterine Insemination with Donor Sperm.J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1668. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121668. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38138895 Free PMC article.
-
Antioxidant Effects of Myo-Inositol Improve the Function and Fertility of Cryopreserved Boar Semen.Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;12(9):1673. doi: 10.3390/antiox12091673. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37759976 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes following two sequential vitrification/warming events at the zygote and blastocyst stages.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Oct;40(10):2357-2365. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02909-6. Epub 2023 Aug 16. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37582908
-
Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 2;12(13):4444. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134444. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37445479 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
