Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;28(1):14-7.
doi: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929173.

Redundancy and variability in quality and outcome reporting for cardiac and thoracic surgery

Jennifer L Dixon  1 , Harry T Papaconstantinou  1 , Bonnie Hodges  1 , Robyn S Korsmo  1 , Dan Jupiter  1 , Jay Shake  1 , Basar Sareyyupoglu  1 , Philip A Rascoe  1 , Scott I Reznik  1
Affiliations

Redundancy and variability in quality and outcome reporting for cardiac and thoracic surgery

Jennifer L Dixon et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Health care is evolving into a value-based reimbursement system focused on quality and outcomes. Reported outcomes from national databases are used for quality improvement projects and public reporting. This study compared reported outcomes in cardiac and thoracic surgery from two validated reporting databases-the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-from January 2011 to June 2012. Quality metrics and outcomes included mortality, wound infection, prolonged ventilation, pneumonia, renal failure, stroke, and cardiac arrest. Comparison was made by chi-square analysis. A total of 737 and 177 cardiac surgery cases and 451 and 105 thoracic surgery cases were captured by the STS database and NSQIP, respectively. Within cardiac surgery, there was a statistically significant difference in the reported rates of prolonged ventilation, renal failure, and mortality. No significant differences were found for the thoracic surgery data. In conclusion, our data indicated a significant discordance in quality reporting for cardiac surgery between the NSQIP and the STS databases. The disparity between databases and duplicate participation strongly indicates that a unified national quality reporting program is required. Consolidation of reporting databases and standardization of morbidity definitions across all databases may improve participation and reduce hospital cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Database variables. NSQIP indicates National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Training Manual. Available at http://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/documents/Training%20Manual%20for... accessed January 5, 2014.
    1. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–267. - PubMed
    1. Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16. - PubMed
    1. Sellers MM, Merkow RP, Halverson A, Hinami K, Kelz RR, Bentrem DJ, Bilimoria KY. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):420–427. - PubMed
    1. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. STS National Database. Available at http://www.sts.org/national-database accessed January 5, 2014.

LinkOut - more resources