Are structured curriculums for laparoscopic training useful? A review of current literature

Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Mar;25(2):163-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000138.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review previous, recent, and future perspectives of laparoscopic training.

Recent findings: Published studies showed the importance and benefits of training programmes in urologic laparoscopic surgery. In addition, laparoscopy at present can be performed for most of surgical modalities specifically in experienced centres. Thereof, well designed training programmes are needed for performing all-purpose laparoscopic surgeries. Additionally, training programmes may help to reduce the laparoscopic complications. However, training programmes should include some steps for performing future surgeries. Thus, structured training programmes can be more useful for urologists and hence should be preferred. Nonetheless, structured training programmes can be difficult to perform and need patience with long learning curve. These can help urologists to prepare for their first urologic laparoscopic procedures.

Summary: Usage of laparoscopic procedures in urological field has been increasing parallel to developments in minimally invasive technologies worldwide. Therefore, there has been an increase in the numbers of urologists who want to learn laparoscopy. At this point, a structured curriculum for laparoscopic training comes into question. However, laparoscopic surgical modalities need to be trained, in large quantities. Training programmes can help surgeons learn and perform laparoscopy properly. However, these should be well designed and structured.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence
  • Curriculum*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / education*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / education*
  • Urology / education*