Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test
- PMID: 25579108
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.076
Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test
Abstract
Objectives: ATHENA evaluated the cobas HPV Test as the primary screen for cervical cancer in women ≥25years. This reports the 3-year end-of-study results comparing the performance of HPV primary screening to different screening and triage combinations.
Methods: 42,209 women ≥25years were enrolled and had cytology and hrHPV testing. Women with abnormal cytology (≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) and those HPV positive were referred to colposcopy. Women not reaching the study endpoint of CIN2+ entered the 3-year follow-up phase.
Results: 3-year CIR of CIN3+ in cytology-negative women was 0.8% (95% CI; 0.5-1.1%), 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.7%) in HPV-negative women, and 0.3% (95% CI; 0.1-0.6%) in cytology and HPV negative women. The sensitivity for CIN3+ of cytology was 47.8% (95% CI; 41.6-54.1%) compared to 61.7% (95% CI; 56.0-67.5%) for the hybrid strategy (cytology if 25-29years and cotesting with cytology and HPV if ≥30years) and 76.1% (95% CI; 70.3-81.8%) for HPV primary. The specificity for CIN3+ was 97.1% (95% CI; 96.9-97.2%), 94.6% (95% CI; 94.4-94.8%), and 93.5% (95% CI; 93.3-93.8%) for cytology, hybrid strategy, and HPV primary, respectively. Although HPV primary detects significantly more cases of CIN3+ in women ≥25years than either cytology or hybrid strategy, it requires significantly more colposcopies. However, the number of colposcopies required to detect a single CIN3+ is the same as for the hybrid strategy.
Conclusions: HPV primary screening in women ≥25years is as effective as a hybrid screening strategy that uses cytology if 25-29years and cotesting if ≥30years. However, HPV primary screening requires less screening tests.
Keywords: Cervical cancer screening; Cervical cytology; HPV.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Transitioning to a new era in cervical cancer screening.Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):175-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.538. Gynecol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25680631 No abstract available.
-
Gynaecological cancer: New standard of care—HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;12(4):194-6. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.37. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25707625 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
-
Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Oct 27. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28094038
-
Combined use of cytology, p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening.Int J Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;147(7):1864-1873. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32973. Epub 2020 Mar 27. Int J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32170961 Clinical Trial.
-
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):687-97, W214-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376. Epub 2011 Oct 17. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22006930 Review.
-
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23543559 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of human papillomavirus age-related prevalence and vaccination levels on interpretation of cervical screening modalities: a modelling study.BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e078551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38309749 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and acceptability of an HPV self-testing strategy: lessons from a research context to assess for ability to implement into primary care at a national level in Botswana.Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Jan 8;4:1300788. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1300788. eCollection 2023. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38259634 Free PMC article.
-
Application an internet facilitation in a community-based cervical cancer screening project.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02733-1. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 38041116 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Papanicolaou Smear Conditions for Manual Microdissection of Single Target Cells.Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 3;11(11):2700. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112700. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 38004711 Free PMC article.
-
A novel tailed primer nucleic acid test for detection of HPV 16, 18 and 45 DNA at the point of care.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47582-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37989845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
