Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations
- PMID: 25585923
- PMCID: PMC4359978
- DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.116
Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations
Abstract
Most molecular measures of inbreeding do not measure inbreeding at the scale that is most relevant for understanding inbreeding depression-namely the proportion of the genome that is identical-by-descent (IBD). The inbreeding coefficient FPed obtained from pedigrees is a valuable estimator of IBD, but pedigrees are not always available, and cannot capture inbreeding loops that reach back in time further than the pedigree. We here propose a molecular approach to quantify the realized proportion of the genome that is IBD (propIBD), and we apply this method to a wild and a captive population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). In each of 948 wild and 1057 captive individuals we analyzed available single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data (260 SNPs) spread over four different genomic regions in each population. This allowed us to determine whether any of these four regions was completely homozygous within an individual, which indicates IBD with high confidence. In the highly nomadic wild population, we did not find a single case of IBD, implying that inbreeding must be extremely rare (propIBD=0-0.00094, 95% CI). In the captive population, a five-generation pedigree strongly underestimated the average amount of realized inbreeding (FPed=0.013<propIBD=0.064), as expected given that pedigree founders were already related. We suggest that this SNP-based technique is generally useful for quantifying inbreeding at the individual or population level, and we show analytically that it can capture inbreeding loops that reach back up to a few hundred generations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(13):3237-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05593.x. Epub 2012 May 3. Mol Ecol. 2012. PMID: 22554318
-
On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(7):1439-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04554.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10. Mol Ecol. 2010. PMID: 20149098
-
A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal.Mol Ecol. 2018 May;27(9):2271-2288. doi: 10.1111/mec.14570. Epub 2018 Apr 29. Mol Ecol. 2018. PMID: 29603504
-
Invited review: Inbreeding in the genomics era: Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and management of genomic variability.J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6009-6024. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12787. Epub 2017 Jun 7. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID: 28601448 Review.
-
Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock.Anim Genet. 2017 Jun;48(3):255-271. doi: 10.1111/age.12526. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Anim Genet. 2017. PMID: 27910110 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.Evol Appl. 2020 Jan 27;13(5):991-1008. doi: 10.1111/eva.12916. eCollection 2020 May. Evol Appl. 2020. PMID: 32431748 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic management on the brink of extinction: sequencing microsatellites does not improve estimates of inbreeding in wild and captive Vancouver Island marmots (Marmota vancouverensis).Conserv Genet. 2022;23(2):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s10592-022-01429-7. Epub 2022 Jan 16. Conserv Genet. 2022. PMID: 35401067 Free PMC article.
-
Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population.Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 15;284(1850):20162763. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2763. Proc Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28250184 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic signatures of inbreeding in a critically endangered parrot, the kākāpō.G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Oct 19;11(11):jkab307. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab307. G3 (Bethesda). 2021. PMID: 34542587 Free PMC article.
-
Neurogenomic insights into the behavioral and vocal development of the zebra finch.Elife. 2021 Jun 9;10:e61849. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61849. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34106827 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bataillon T, Kirkpatrick M. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet Res. 2000;75:75–81. - PubMed
-
- Blaker H. Confidence curves and improved exact confidence intervals for discrete distributions. Can J Stat. 2000;28:783–798.
-
- Bolund E, Martin K, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch. Anim Behav. 2010;79:947–955.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
