Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework
- PMID: 25589094
- PMCID: PMC4316850
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003675
Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework
Abstract
Diagnostic errors are major contributors to harmful patient outcomes, yet they remain a relatively understudied and unmeasured area of patient safety. Although they are estimated to affect about 12 million Americans each year in ambulatory care settings alone, both the conceptual and pragmatic scientific foundation for their measurement is under-developed. Health care organizations do not have the tools and strategies to measure diagnostic safety and most have not integrated diagnostic error into their existing patient safety programs. Further progress toward reducing diagnostic errors will hinge on our ability to overcome measurement-related challenges. In order to lay a robust groundwork for measurement and monitoring techniques to ensure diagnostic safety, we recently developed a multifaceted framework to advance the science of measuring diagnostic errors (The Safer Dx framework). In this paper, we describe how the framework serves as a conceptual foundation for system-wide safety measurement, monitoring and improvement of diagnostic error. The framework accounts for the complex adaptive sociotechnical system in which diagnosis takes place (the structure), the distributed process dimensions in which diagnoses evolve beyond the doctor's visit (the process) and the outcomes of a correct and timely "safe diagnosis" as well as patient and health care outcomes (the outcomes). We posit that the Safer Dx framework can be used by a variety of stakeholders including researchers, clinicians, health care organizations and policymakers, to stimulate both retrospective and more proactive measurement of diagnostic errors. The feedback and learning that would result will help develop subsequent interventions that lead to safer diagnosis, improved value of health care delivery and improved patient outcomes.
Keywords: Diagnostic errors; Health services research; Information technology; Medical error, measurement/epidemiology; Quality measurement.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures
Comment in
-
Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors. Response to: 'Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework' by Singh and Sittig.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):345. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004091. Epub 2015 Mar 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 25749026 No abstract available.
-
Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):345-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004140. Epub 2015 Mar 17. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 25784768 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety.Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):315-323. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0012. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019. PMID: 31287795
-
Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):602-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3601-x. Epub 2016 Feb 22. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26902245 Free PMC article.
-
Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors. Response to: 'Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework' by Singh and Sittig.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):345. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004091. Epub 2015 Mar 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 25749026 No abstract available.
-
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):226-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. Epub 2015 Sep 14. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. PMID: 26369894 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tracking Progress in Improving Diagnosis: A Framework for Defining Undesirable Diagnostic Events.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1187-1191. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4304-2. Epub 2018 Jan 29. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29380218 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Let us talk about mistakes.Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06034-z. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39210092
-
Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 20;13(14):4245. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144245. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using incident reports to diagnose communication challenges for precision intervention in learning health systems: A methods paper.Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 9;8(Suppl 1):e10425. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10425. eCollection 2024 Jun. Learn Health Syst. 2024. PMID: 38883872 Free PMC article.
-
Automating detection of diagnostic error of infectious diseases using machine learning.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jun 7;3(6):e0000528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000528. eCollection 2024 Jun. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38848317 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis.J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 20;42(21):2506-2515. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01523. Epub 2024 May 8. J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38718321 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources