Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals

J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of TRUShape® 3D Conforming Files, compared with Twisted Files, in reducing bacteria load from root canal walls, in the presence or absence of irrigant agitation.

Methods: Extracted human premolars with single oval-shaped canals were infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Teeth in Group I (N=10; NaOCl and QMix® 2in1 as respective initial and final irrigants) were subdivided into 4 subgroups: (A) TRUShape® instrumentation without irrigant activation; (B) TRUShape® instrumentation with sonic irrigant agitation; (C) Twisted Files without irrigant agitation; (D) Twisted Files with sonic irrigant agitation. To remove confounding factor (antimicrobial irrigants), teeth in Group II (N=10) were irrigated with sterile saline, using the same subgroup designations. Specimens before and after chemomechanical débridement were cultured for quantification of colony-forming units (CFUs). Data from each group were analyzed separately using two-factor ANOVA and Holm-Sidak multiple comparison (α=0.05). Canal wall bacteria were qualitatively examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy of Taylor-modified Brown and Brenn-stained demineralised sections.

Results: CFUs from subgroups in Group I were not significantly different (P=0.935). For Group II, both file type (P<0.001) and irrigant agitation (P<0.001) significantly affected log-reduction in CFU concentrations. The interaction of these two factors was not significant (P=0.601). Although SEM showed reduced canal wall bacteria, bacteria were present within dentinal tubules after rotary instrumentation, as revealed by light microscopy of longitudinal root sections.

Conclusions: TRUShape® files removed significantly more canal wall bacteria than Twisted Files when used without an antibacterial irrigant; the latter is required to decontaminate dentinal tubules.

Clinical significance: Root canal disinfection should not be focused only on a mechanistic approach. Rather, the rational choice of a rotary instrumentation system should be combined with the use of well-tested antimicrobial irrigants and delivery/agitation techniques to establish a clinically realistic chemomechanical débridement protocol.

Keywords: Canal conforming; Dentine conservation; E. faecalis; Nickel titanium; Rotary instrumentation; Sonic agitation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alloys*
  • Anti-Infective Agents / pharmacology
  • Bacterial Load
  • Bicuspid / microbiology
  • Biguanides / pharmacology
  • Dental Instruments / microbiology*
  • Dental Pulp Cavity / drug effects
  • Dental Pulp Cavity / microbiology*
  • Dentin / drug effects
  • Dentin / microbiology
  • Disinfection / instrumentation
  • Disinfection / methods
  • Enterococcus faecalis / drug effects
  • Enterococcus faecalis / pathogenicity
  • Humans
  • Polymers / pharmacology
  • Root Canal Irrigants / pharmacology
  • Root Canal Preparation / instrumentation*
  • Root Canal Preparation / methods
  • Root Canal Therapy / instrumentation*
  • Root Canal Therapy / methods
  • Rotation
  • Sodium Hypochlorite / pharmacology

Substances

  • Alloys
  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Biguanides
  • Polymers
  • QMix root canal irrigant
  • Root Canal Irrigants
  • nitinol
  • Sodium Hypochlorite