A meta-analysis of high dose, intermittent vitamin D supplementation among older adults

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 20;10(1):e0115850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115850. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background: The effects of intermittent, high dose vitamin D treatment in older adults have not been documented. We conducted a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the efficiency of intermittent, high dose vitamin D treatment on falls, fractures, and mortality among older adults.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on high dose, intermittent vitamin D supplementation among older adults. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to specified inclusive and exclusive criteria to extract the data. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.1.0 software.

Results: Nine trials were included in this meta-analysis. High dose, intermittent vitamin D therapy did not decrease all-cause mortality among older adults. The risk ratio (95% CI) was 1.04 (0.91-1.17). No benefit was seen in fracture or fall prevention. The risk ratio for hip fractures (95% CI) was 1.17 (0.97-1.41) while for non-vertebral fractures (95% CI) it was 1.06 (0.91-1.22), and the risk ratio for falls (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.96-1.08). Results remained robust after sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion: Supplementation of intermittent, high dose vitamin D may not be effective in preventing overall mortality, fractures, or falls among older adults. The route of administration of vitamin D supplements may well change the physiological effects.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Accidental Falls / prevention & control
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Dietary Supplements*
  • Female
  • Fractures, Bone / drug therapy
  • Fractures, Bone / epidemiology*
  • Fractures, Bone / etiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mortality
  • Odds Ratio
  • Publication Bias
  • Qualitative Research
  • Vitamin D / administration & dosage*

Substances

  • Vitamin D

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.