In recent years, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has experienced upgrades with enhanced functionalities and modeling capacities as it gets to the current version, SWAT2012. Changes in the SWAT code on a specific process may result in propagating influences in the output of other related processes. In this study, the characteristic significance of the enhancements in SWAT code was investigated using the two recent versions, SWAT2009 and SWAT2012. Using a global optimization technique, each model was calibrated for flow, sediment, and nutrient and then tested for transferability of parameters between the models. Results indicate that flow and water quality output were well calibrated with both models. However, the calibrated parameters determined by SWAT2009 and SWAT2012 were noticeably different, due mostly to the enhancements made in SWAT2012. Our results indicate that only the stream flow result was reliable when the models were upgraded or downgraded between the two versions after calibration. Sediment prediction was marginally reliable. SWAT parameters were nontransferrable if nutrient was the main output. The differences are due to various reasons, such as disparities in algorithms at the process level and propagation of the resulting uncertainty into higher-order processes.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs.Environ Manage. 2016 Apr;57(4):894-911. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0636-4. Epub 2015 Nov 30. Environ Manage. 2016. PMID: 26616430 Free PMC article.
Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions.J Environ Manage. 2008 Aug;88(3):393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 1. J Environ Manage. 2008. PMID: 17475392
Evaluating the capabilities of watershed-scale models in estimating sediment yield at field-scale.J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jun 10. J Environ Manage. 2013. PMID: 23764473
Multiobjective calibration for comparing channel sediment routing models in the soil and water assessment tool.J Environ Qual. 2014 Jan;43(1):110-20. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0364. J Environ Qual. 2014. PMID: 25602545
Modelling water and nutrient fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT.Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 15;603-604:196-218. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.242. Epub 2017 Jun 17. Sci Total Environ. 2017. PMID: 28628812 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 1 article
Impacts of Watershed Characteristics and Crop Rotations on Winter Cover Crop Nitrate-Nitrogen Uptake Capacity within Agricultural Watersheds in the Chesapeake Bay Region.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0157637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157637. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27352119 Free PMC article.