Immediate effects of an elastic knee sleeve on frontal plane gait biomechanics in knee osteoarthritis

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 26;10(1):e0115782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115782. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of the knee affects millions of people. Elastic knee sleeves aim at relieving symptoms. While symptomatic improvements have been demonstrated as a consequence of elastic knee sleeves, evidence for biomechanical alterations only exists for the sagittal plane. We therefore asked what effect an elastic knee sleeve would have on frontal plane gait biomechanics.

Methods: 18 subjects (8 women, 10 men) with osteoarthritis of the medial tibiofemoral joint walked over ground with and without an elastic knee sleeve. Kinematics and forces were recorded and joint moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. Conditions with sleeve and without sleeve were compared with paired t-Tests.

Results: With the sleeve, knee adduction angle at ground contact was reduced by 1.9 ± 2.1° (P = 0.006). Peak knee adduction was reduced by 1.5 ± 1.6° (P = 0.004). The first peak knee adduction moment and positive knee adduction impulse were decreased by 10.1% (0.74 ± 0.9 Nm • kg-1; P = 0.002) and 12.9% (0.28 ± 0.3 Nm • s • kg-1; P < 0.004), respectively.

Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that wearing an elastic knee sleeve during walking can reduce knee adduction angles, moments and impulse in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. As a higher knee adduction moment has previously been identified as a risk factor for disease progression in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, we speculate that wearing a knee sleeve may be beneficial for this specific subgroup.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Braces
  • Female
  • Gait*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / physiopathology
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / therapy*
  • Walking

Grants and funding

Part of the funding and material (knee sleeves) for the study were provided by the BAUERFEIND AG (Zeulenroda, Germany, www.bauerfeind.com). The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg in the funding programme Open Access Publishing. All other funding was acquired from internal means of the Department of Sport Science (www.sport.uni-freiburg.de) of the University of Freiburg (www.uni-freiburg.de). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.