Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 12:8:235.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00235. eCollection 2014.

The prelimbic cortex uses higher-order cues to modulate both the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear

Affiliations

The prelimbic cortex uses higher-order cues to modulate both the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear

Melissa J Sharpe et al. Front Syst Neurosci. .

Abstract

The prelimbic (PL) cortex allows rodents to adapt their responding under changing experimental circumstances. In line with this, the PL cortex has been implicated in strategy set shifting, attentional set shifting, the resolution of response conflict, and the modulation of attention towards predictive stimuli. One interpretation of this research is that the PL cortex is involved in using information garnered from higher-order cues in the environment to modulate how an animal responds to environmental stimuli. However, data supporting this view of PL function in the aversive domain are lacking. In the following experiments, we attempted to answer two questions. Firstly, we wanted to investigate whether the role of the PL cortex in using higher-order cues to influence responding generalizes across appetitive and aversive domains. Secondly, as much of the research has focused on a role for the PL cortex in performance, we wanted to assess whether this region is also involved in the acquisition of hierarchal associations which facilitate an ability to use higher-order cues to modulate responding. In order to answer these questions, we assessed the impact of PL inactivation during both the acquisition and expression of a contextual bi-conditional discrimination. A contextual bi-conditional discrimination involves presenting two stimuli. In one context, one stimulus is paired with shock while the other is presented without shock. In another context, these contingencies are reversed. Thus, animals have to use the present contextual cues to disambiguate the significance of the stimulus and respond appropriately. We found that PL inactivation disrupted both the encoding and expression of these context-dependent associations. This supports a role for the PL cortex in allowing higher-order cues to modulate both learning about, and responding towards, different cues. We discuss these findings in the broader context of functioning in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC).

Keywords: bi-conditional discrimination; context; extinction; fear conditioning; fear expression; infralimbic cortex; learning; prelimbic cortex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the placement of the cannula tips for Experiments 1 and 2. Placement for cannula tips in Experiment 1 represented on the left (A), and cannula placement for Experiment 2 represented on the right (B). Coronal sections are taken from the following points on the antero-posterior plane beginning at top: +4.20, +3.70, +2.20, and +2.70 anterior to bregma (Paxinos and Watson, 1998).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responding during acquisition of the contextual bi-conditional discrimination for Experiment 1. All rats exhibited high levels of suppression towards both the reinforced and non-reinforced cues during conditioning.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PL inactivation during test disrupted expression of the associations acquired during the contextual bi-conditional discrimination. Rates of responding are represented as suppression ratios for CS presentation (±SEM). Rats receiving saline infusions at test exhibited greater levels of suppression to the CS paired with shock in that context, relative to the CS presented without shock in that context. Rats receiving muscimol infusions into the PL cortex at test failed to exhibit context-specific responding towards the CSs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Responding during acquisition of the contextual bi-conditional discrimination for Experiment 2. All rats exhibited high levels of suppression towards both the reinforced and non-reinforced cues during conditioning.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PL inactivation during conditioning disrupted acquisition of the contextual bi-conditional discrimination. Rates of responding are represented as mean suppression ratios (±SEM) for CS presentations. Rats receiving saline infusions during conditioning exhibited greater levels of suppression to the CS paired with shock in that context, relative to the CS presented without shock in that context. Rats receiving muscimol infusions into the PL cortex during conditioning failed to exhibit context selective responding towards the CSs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balleine B. W., Dickinson A. (1998). Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology 37, 407–419. 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00033-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouton M. E. (1993). Context, time and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol. Bull. 114, 80–99. 10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.80 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouton M. E. (1994). Context, ambiguity and classical conditioning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 3, 49–53 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769943 - DOI
    1. Braver T. S., Cohen J. D. (2000). “On the control of control: the role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal functioning and working memory,” in Attention and Performance XVIII; Control of Cognitive Processes, eds Monsell S., Driver J. (Cambridge, MA: MIT press; ), 713–737.
    1. Cohen J. D., Dunbar K., McClelland J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97, 332–361. 10.1037//0033-295x.97.3.332 - DOI - PubMed