Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar;19(3):117-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning

Affiliations
Review

Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning

Ram Frost et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Statistical learning (SL) is typically considered to be a domain-general mechanism by which cognitive systems discover the underlying distributional properties of the input. However, recent studies examining whether there are commonalities in the learning of distributional information across different domains or modalities consistently reveal modality and stimulus specificity. Therefore, important questions are how and why a hypothesized domain-general learning mechanism systematically produces such effects. Here, we offer a theoretical framework according to which SL is not a unitary mechanism, but a set of domain-general computational principles that operate in different modalities and, therefore, are subject to the specific constraints characteristic of their respective brain regions. This framework offers testable predictions and we discuss its computational and neurobiological plausibility.

Keywords: domain-general mechanisms; modality specificity; neurobiologically plausible models; statistical learning; stimulus specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Theoretical Model of Statistical Learning
Schematic representation of the processing of distributional information in the visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortex, for unimodal and multimodal events. Different encoded representations of continuous input presented in time or space result in task-stimulus specificity, in spite of similar computations and contributions from partially shared neurocomputational networks.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Key Neural Networks involved in Visual and Auditory Statistical Learning
Key brain regions associated with domain-general (blue), and lower- and higher-level auditory (green) and visual (red) modality-specific processing and representation, plotted on a smoothed ICBM152 template brain. The depicted regions are not intended to constitute an exhaustive set of brain regions subserving each domain. C = Cuneus, FG = Fusiform Gyrus, STG = Superior Temporal Gyrus, IPL = Inferior Parietal Lobule, H = Hippocampus, T = Thalamus, CA = Caudate, IFG = Inferior Frontal Gyrus. Generated with the BrainNet Viewer [89].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chomsky N. A Review of B.F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language (Baltim) 1959;35:26–58.
    1. Eimas PD, et al. Speech perception in infants. Science (80-. ) 1971;171:303–306. - PubMed
    1. Saffran JR, et al. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science (80-. ) 1996;274:1926–1928. - PubMed
    1. Baker CI, et al. Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. Psychol. Sci. 2004;15:460–466. - PubMed
    1. Goujon A, Fagot J. Learning of spatial statistics in nonhuman primates: Contextual cueing in baboons (Papio papio). Behav. Brain Res. 2013;247:101–109. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources