Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 26 (4), 1271-81

Calcium Intake and Bone Mineral Density as an Example of Non-Linearity and Threshold Analysis

Affiliations

Calcium Intake and Bone Mineral Density as an Example of Non-Linearity and Threshold Analysis

L P Breitling. Osteoporos Int.

Abstract

Non-linearity is a likely phenomenon in bone metabolism, but is often ignored in pertinent epidemiological studies. Using NHANES III data on calcium intake and bone mineral density, the most important non-linear methods are introduced and discussed. The results should motivate researchers to consider non-linearity in this field more frequently.

Introduction: Many relationships in bone metabolism and homeostasis are likely to follow non-linear patterns. Detailed dose-response analyses allowing for non-linear associations nonetheless remain scarce in this field.

Methods: A detailed analysis of NHANES III data on dietary calcium intake and bone mineral density was used to demonstrate the application and some of the challenges of the most important dose-response methods, including LOESS, categorical analysis, fractional polynomials, restricted cubic splines, and segmented regression.

Results: The spline estimate suggested increasing bone mineral density up to a calcium intake of about 1 g/day and a plateau thereafter. In segmented regression, the break-point marking the beginning of the plateau was placed at an intake of 0.58 (95 % confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.82) g/day. Sensitivity analyses suggested a less curved dose-response in women.

Conclusions: Knowing about the possibilities and limitations of non-linear dose-response approaches should encourage researchers to consider these methods more frequently in studies on bone health and disease. The example analysis suggested bone mineral density to reach a plateau slightly below current calcium intake recommendations, with fairly pronounced differences of the dose-response shape by sex and menopausal status.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. Cancer Res. 2008 May 15;68(10):3970-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Sep;86(3):639-44 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan;17(1):91-8 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2003 Oct 15;22(19):3055-71 - PubMed
    1. J Nutr. 2010 Nov;140(11):2030S-45S - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback