Hospital-based trends in penile prosthetic surgery
- PMID: 25664424
- DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12829
Hospital-based trends in penile prosthetic surgery
Abstract
Introduction: We examined national and regional trends in hospital-based penile prosthetic surgery and identified patient-specific factors predicting receipt of inflatable vs. semi-rigid penile prostheses.
Aims: To improve our understanding of the surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED).
Methods: We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2010 in the United States and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database from 1995 to 2010. Total number of penile implants performed and proportions of inflatable vs. semi-rigid prosthesis were examined. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to identify factors associated with selection of inflatable vs. semi-rigid prostheses.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measure is the total number of hospital-based penile prosthetic surgeries performed in the United States over a 12-year period (1998-2010). Secondary outcome measures include proportion of inflatable and semi-rigid prosthesis implantations and factors influencing receipt of different prostheses.
Results: We identified 53,967 penile prosthetic surgeries in the NIS; annual number implanted decreased from 4,703 to 2,338. Inflatable prostheses incurred higher costs but had a similar length of stay (LOS). In MVA, Caucasian race, Peyronie's disease, and private insurance were independently associated with receipt of an inflatable prosthesis. We identified 7,054 penile prostheses in OSHPD; annual number implanted decreased from 760 to 318. The proportion of inflatable prostheses increased significantly from 78.4% to 88.4% between 2001 and 2010. Inflatable prostheses incurred higher costs but had similar median LOS. In MVA, Caucasians and men without spinal cord injury were more likely to receive inflatable prosthesis.
Conclusion: Hospital-based penile prosthetic surgery has decreased substantially both nationwide and in California. In the United States, Caucasian race, Peyronie's disease, and private insurance were independently associated with receipt of an inflatable penile prosthesis. California population data correlated with national trends and can be utilized to further study surgical management of ED.
Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthetic Surgery; Population Trends.
© 2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Trends in Penile Prosthetics: Influence of Patient Demographics, Surgeon Volume, and Hospital Volume on Type of Penile Prosthesis Inserted in New York State.J Sex Med. 2018 Feb;15(2):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 29. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 29292061
-
Global Trends in Prevalence, Treatments, and Costs of Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction in Men.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):803-813. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 24. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 34034995 Review.
-
[Evolution of the number and type of penile prostheses implanted in France for erectile dysfunction: Analysis of French national coding database (2006-2013)].Prog Urol. 2016 Sep;26(9):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 31. Prog Urol. 2016. PMID: 27590101 French.
-
Use of inflatable penile prostheses AMS CX with momentary squeeze in a patient with Peyronie's disease after removal of two previously implanted penile prostheses.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Mar 28;86(1):46-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.1.46. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014. PMID: 24704933
-
Practical Considerations in Inflatable Penile Implant Surgery.J Sex Med. 2021 Aug;18(8):1320-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jul 8. J Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 34247953 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of Peyronie's disease insurance coverage.Sex Med. 2024 Oct 24;12(5):qfae071. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae071. eCollection 2024 Oct. Sex Med. 2024. PMID: 39450208 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Feb 10;15:27-36. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S251364. eCollection 2022. Med Devices (Auckl). 2022. PMID: 35177941 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A narrative review of the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients undergoing penile prosthesis surgery.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2695-2704. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1225. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34295754 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_124_19. Asian J Androl. 2020. PMID: 31793443 Free PMC article.
-
Penile Implant Considerations in the Bladder Cancer Survivor.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jan 28;20(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0873-9. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30689132 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
