Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention
- PMID: 25673216
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0804-9
Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention
Abstract
Performing more poorly given one's skill level ("choking") is likely in situations that offer an incentive if a certain outcome is achieved (outcome pressure) or when one is being watched by others-especially when one's performance is being evaluated (monitoring pressure). According to the choking literature, outcome pressure is associated with reduced executive control of attention, whereas monitoring pressure is associated with increased, yet counterproductive, attention to skill processes. Here, we show the first evidence that monitoring pressure-being watched by the experimenter-may lead individuals with higher working memory to choke on a classic measure of executive control-just the task effect thought to result from outcome pressure. Not only does this finding help refine our understanding of the processes underlying choking under monitoring pressure, but it also leads to a new look at classic audience effects, with an important implication for experimental psychology.
Keywords: Choking under pressure; Executive attention; Simon task; Social presence; Working memory.
Similar articles
-
Choking under experimenter's presence: Impact on proactive control and practical consequences for psychological science.Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Cognition. 2019. PMID: 30927658
-
Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):390-406. doi: 10.1037/a0023466. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011. PMID: 21574739 Clinical Trial.
-
Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Mar;46(3):610-20. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984. PMID: 6707866
-
Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements.Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 10;9:19. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00019. eCollection 2015. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25713517 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individual vs. Team Sport Failure-Similarities, Differences, and Current Developments.Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:930025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930025. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35814091 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Inhibiting responses under the watch of a recently synchronized peer increases self-monitoring: evidence from functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Open Biol. 2024 Feb;14(2):230382. doi: 10.1098/rsob.230382. Epub 2024 Feb 21. Open Biol. 2024. PMID: 38378138 Free PMC article.
-
Performance-linked visual feedback slows response times during a sustained attention task.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 29;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00487-w. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023. PMID: 37247039 Free PMC article.
-
Under pressure: the interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1103-1117. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01768-z. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36988737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257753. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34591880 Free PMC article.
-
An Experimenter's Influence on Motor Enhancements: The Effects of Letter Congruency and Sensory Switch-Costs on Multisensory Integration.Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:588343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588343. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33335500 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
