The role of nonrandomized trials in the evaluation of oncology drugs

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 May;97(5):502-7. doi: 10.1002/cpt.86. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

Although randomized trials provide the most reliable evidence of a drug's safety and efficacy, there are situations where randomized trials are not possible or ethical. In this article we discuss when and how single-arm trials can be used to support full approval of oncology drugs. These include situations in which an unprecedented effect on tumor response is observed in a setting of high unmet medical need, clinical trial patients have been well characterized, enabling a target population to be clearly defined, experience exists in a sufficient number of patients to allow adequate assessment of the risk:benefit relationship, and a proper historical context can be provided for analysis. We also discuss how response rates might be considered predictive of long-term outcomes or clinically meaningful in and of themselves in certain contexts.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / standards
  • Drug Approval
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / methods*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / standards
  • Humans
  • Medical Oncology / methods*
  • Medical Oncology / standards
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Research Design* / standards
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents