Comparative effectiveness in thyroid cancer: key questions and how to answer them

Cancer Treat Res. 2015:164:67-87. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_5.

Abstract

Controversies in treatment of thyroid cancer remain despite numerous published studies. Robust comparative effectiveness studies examining: (1) the role of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection (pCCND) in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC); (2) the use of post-operative radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation therapy following total thyroidectomy; (3) use of low versus high doses of I-131 in RAI therapy; (4) thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) versus recombinant thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH) prior to RAI; and (5) the role of routine measurement of serum calcitonin levels are needed to help strengthen existing treatment recommendations. Reasons for the controversies and suggestions for quality comparative effectiveness studies are discussed.

MeSH terms

  • Calcitonin / blood
  • Carcinoma / surgery
  • Carcinoma, Papillary
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research / methods*
  • Humans
  • Iodine Radioisotopes / therapeutic use
  • Neck Dissection / methods
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Radiotherapy / methods
  • Recombinant Proteins / genetics
  • Recombinant Proteins / pharmacology
  • Thyroid Cancer, Papillary
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / mortality
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / pathology
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / surgery
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Thyrotropin / genetics
  • Thyrotropin / pharmacology
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Iodine Radioisotopes
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Thyrotropin
  • Calcitonin